Anti establishment but stick up for capitalists making obscene amounts of money whilst blaming us proles for demanding living wages?. It’s not socialist to want a fair pay when the elite take take take . The CEOs etc love the WEF and their agendas . It’s what helps drive up their profits etc
The guy responding isn't sticking up for HSBC or Shell he's pointing out that the UK government are powerless to seize profits from foreign owned companies & hand them to poor UK residents. Perhaps Sunak could ban Shell oil from trading in the UK ? Iphones are expensive the latest Samsung s23 is £1600 poor people can't afford them, the UK government can't set the price at say £100 & expect apple or Samsung to comply it's the same for Shell. I wouldn't be opposed to Nationalising energy & striving to become energy independent by drilling for gas & oil but both parties have bought into carbon net Zero 2030 so there's no will to reduce fuel prices. Hong Kong Singapore Bank didn't crash our economy that was Boris , Sunak , Starmer, Hancock etc & the covid bullshit
I find it confusing that a person who is anti: Government, WEF, EU, ‘Big Pharma’, WHO, Digital Currency, Digital ID is readily able to stick up for huge corporations making vast profits while the ‘normal’ man must put up with ever increasing costs and is lambasted for asking for wage rises (and even blamed for these increasing costs). Your tweet response and follow up seem to say it’s OK to do this due to how they operate. The massive profits may be generated form their Global operations (and in case of SHELL etc, using the proxy wars/money laundering in UKRAINE as a reason – something which you are also against), however, that doesn’t mean that they should be allowed just to increase costs ‘locally’ (with no reasonable justification other than ‘GLOBAL (IST) events), awarding themselves massive pay rises whilst we all have to take a big bite out of a **** sandwich and grin. The UK government can (and could ) curb the ever increasing costs . Of course they can. They choose not to and we know why , as individuals, they stand to make money out of it . It’s jut another way to force us towards UBI, DC and DI. It’s not right and ‘ordinary’ people should not be happy and accept it.
It wasn't my tweet you trumpet. We buy energy from foreign companies that sucks, Biden blowing up NS2 probably doesn't help . We are ploughing trillions into green energy scams which both parties are pushing for . We can't Nationalise foreign energy companies
I know it wasn’t your tweet but it was your response to the OP tweet which supports the rights of these companies to do as they wish. I’m not calling for nationalisation. Im saying we shouldn’t have to put up with the situation where we ‘survive’ whilst they lavish themselves . it’s all by design .
It's by design UN 2030 Unfortunately our government & opposition sold us out to ridiculous green energy bullshit that we are locked into . We have gas & oil drill it & start fracking
With new petrol and diesel cars set to be banned from showrooms in the UK in 2030 and across Europe from 2035, there could still be life in the internal combustion engine beyond these deadlines, according to leaked documents. A draft proposal from the European Commission - reportedly seen by Reuters on Tuesday - will allow sales of new cars with internal combustion engines that run only on climate neutral e-fuels. Just last month, the European Parliament formally approved a law to effectively ban the sale of any new car with a combustion engine - including petrol, diesel and hybrid models - in the European Union from 2035. However, in an attempt to resolve a spat with Germany over the EU's phasing out of combustion engine cars, a new stipulation could allow these models to remain in showroom if they run purely on carbon-neutral fuels. The efuels include carbon 'sucked' from the atmosphere using energy intensive technology to be stored underground, at locations that just happen to have oil in, that will be driven out by the carbon to be used. It also includes adding hydrogen to the carbon to make hydrocarbon fuel...to be burned, and require emissions 'sucking' from the atmosphere where the circle continues. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/cars/news...p&cvid=dbe60c9f29ec43c4879eee9b6ed71879&ei=15
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/article/explainer/paying-net-zero#:~:text=Other analyses have come to,£1.1trn in savings. Other analyses have come to broadly similar conclusions. In a July 2021 report on fiscal risks, the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated a net cost of the UK reaching net zero by 2050 to be £321bn, or just over £10bn per year.[7] This is made up of around £1.4trn in costs, offset by around £1.1trn in savings. £1.4 trillion of tax payers money to be spent on unicorn fart powered green energy
There's a good argument to be made that the doom goblin and eco freaks are very useful idiots to the energy companies, as they are able to demonise those pointing out the flaws in the logic leaving the big companies free to drive through measures that cost them little, will have little if any real impact on climate change, and make them far greater profits from a lower energy product, that will have a higher volume just to add to the increase in cost, all sold as 'green'.
Or set fire to each other for following a different version of Star Wars like the African Muslims burning Pakistani Muslims recently. Not many Jedi grooming gangs or Jedi extremists blowing up London trains , stabbing non Jedis or running over people in vans of peace . Religiously motivated terrorism in the UK is pretty much exclusively from Muslims , lefties always pretend there is a far right threat but it's non existent. The 2 terrorism incidents on Muslims recently were Muslim African attackers , almost certainly new arrivals .