see.... you were doing so well but none of them will buy your stuff when you say stuff like this. They all know i'm neither reasonable nor fair.
This is the longest set of posts you have managed without a ****ing wrestling gif since the takeover .
Buying success is ubiquitous. There's very few examples in the past 50 odd years of someone not "buying" their way to improved teams and success. Be it hiring managers, buying cleverly (still buying) or splurging cash wildly. Theres a huge difference between ye olden days for having 40 or 50, 000 match going fans leading to buying a good team and even jack walker pumping his personal fortune into Blackburn. Theres another world of difference between that and oil states doing it to make themselves look less despotic. no difference between it and Russian GP, winter Olympics or world Cup
They should ditch ffp to allow a sportswashing at newcastle because currently it's a business opportunity.
It was only roman and the city owner that pulled out because of it . The others hung in there and then came out saying sorry . Chelsea now have an American owner and are in 10th place and Man City are now being threatened. I see it going ahead personally.
the prem will do self harm and expel clubs if they try. the very best thing for the prem to do is drop an explusion on city and put them league 2 next season and that'll put the absolute fear of gold in these clubs as there is no super league and won't be for years if leven if they had 80 sides.
I love this gaslighting that started, as I remember, with the go-to client journalist himself, Martin Samuel " City and Chelsea were always too noble to get involved with the ghastly Americans and their fiendish, wicked plot and they baled out with a sense of integrity and righteousness". My arse - if United, Liverpool, Arsenal and Spurs were going into a super league with the money and status, so they were they. They quit when the backlash from their own clubs started. Only Bayern and Dortmund come out of this smelling of roses (and PSG? - can't remember if they got involved). The sports washing clubs were just as much ****houses as anybody else.
psg didn't come out of anything smelling of anything but political chicanery and ****housing. the only reason they were not front and centre was city was involved and they wanted to break the other rail state for their own ends roll in to today and the blood world Cup is down and this sithole wasn't to own man utd and psg at the same time let's see uefa roll over on this and just prove the point that they are corrupt.
Bayer and psg had no need to be in it. Both win the leagues every year and can cherry pick the players from their rivals in the league each season. Why would you give up that gravy train?
Point is, they stated their position straight away. City and Chelsea jumped on the bandwagon when they thought they were missing out - then jumped off and tried to act all noble when it became clear it was heading over the cliff. The gaslighting by some ever since has been completely nauseous.
