Other sides do **** up, just we watch them less so don't see it as much. That said I do wonder why we seem to have less composure at home than away - we do seem to have an issue handling expectation at the MKM.
I've not told anyone to shut up, just outlined arguments against posts I disagree with. It's called a debate, it's what message boards are for. You're the one who behaves like a petulent child whilst thinking whatever you say should go with not an ounce of justification, then chucking insults when someone disagrees.
Bottom left and one pic up is mine, weak tea for me and I sometimes even put the teabag in the cup! The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
I'd rather be one goal down than three goals down but giving a goal away every other match is quite likely whereas losing by attacking is less likely
Well we can agree we should attack more, score more and concede less. The question is the best way to go about it and I feel that what Rosie is doing is better than before.
Ingram took a free kick and passed to a player a short distance from him. The player then passed it back to him. By this time the Blackpool players were closing all the players down. What was the advantage over choosing a more sensible ball straight from the free kick?
So there wasn't a similar incident a few matches previously that cost us a goal? We are not scoring enough to laugh off conceding goals.
Given that Rosenior was going apeshit on the touchline when he took it and then criticised the decision in the post match presser clearly there was no advantage and he should have gone long in that situation. That said Woods was about 30 yards away and Ingram didn't get enough on it either, so it was poor on a couple of levels- if you watch it back. Point is, that is not what they're being asked to do.
