Don't ask me.......lots of ways it could have been done but Biden is the first I've heard say they would attack the line and must have spoken about with military top brass
Where did I put the question mark? I know nothing about explosives, but maybe the Russians built in a debt recovery mechanism, in the event of non payment of bills.
Two things with your initial comment to me. I've not heard Biden use the word 'attack' in relation to the pipeline, and I've seen the recording and cannot remember him specifically using that word in the video. Secondly your comment IE 'and must have spoken about with military top brass' - is nothing but mere conjecture, you have no way of knowing what Biden did or didn't do. And disucussions with his miltary top brass, would not be seen as unusual, because unless you've forgot, there is a war in the Ukraine.
So firstly you don't remember him saying the word attack.....not my issue you got selective memory. Secondly so he did speak to top brass because there was a war on....ffs dude stop looking into everything I write yet let yourself open like a gay boys arse hole in a barrymore pool party
First thing I'd want to know is why Ruskies would blow up the pipeline when they could just turn it off at their end.
No idea mate although one that I had thought about - Maybe Russia had seen the same video that we all had seen, so decided to play a few games with it. I'm not saying Russia did it btw, it's all unknowns. However, on the other side of the coin, could Russia get in that area, use specialist equipment and get back out again without being seen. I think it's as I said in my original post to Abe, it could have been anyone, yes, that includes America.
I don't think brb was suggesting anything one way or the other tbh. I just responded bcos it's the first thing I thought when I heard about it.
Seriously though seems an utterly pointless false flag if ruskies being suggested. And a false flag is the only possible reason you can give for ruskies doing it. Which serves zero purpose when you consider they could achieve far more and cost themselves far less, if they simply turned it off
I don't know why, but I'm thinking it was already shut down, and the gas that is escaping is what was in the pipes running under the seabed but otherwise yes I would agree with you.
Theres thousands of miles of gas still in the pipeline to keep it pressurised and gas going in and out to keep it to the right pressures (minimal) depending on things like temp. That bubbling is all that stuff coming out
Yeah that's it (what I meant) but you said better lol. I was having a read of this as you posted... https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022...o-far-about-the-nord-stream-gas-pipeline-leak Each line of the pipeline consists of about 100,000 24-tonne concrete-weight coated steel pipes laid on the seabed. The pipelines have a constant internal diameter of 1.153m, according to Nord Stream. Sections lie at a depth of around 80-110m.
This is what I mean It's easy to sit here in the UK and say, 'oh those Ruskies have known what's been going on for ages, so why didn't they protest then, given that they want asylum now ?' If you live in a country where dissent is met with you either being sent to prison without trial, or sent off to Ukraine with a tampon to soak up a bullet wound, then you aren't afforded that luxury of the right to protest.