Where are all the "sportswashing" crew now - 7 teams spend more than us

https://talksport.com/football/1183...-united-liverpool-arsenal-tottenham-man-city/

Chelsea, United, Spurs, West Ham, Forest, Wolves, City - All spent more.

In Europe -

The 10 biggest spenders
Club Transfer spending (€m)
Chelsea 282
Manchester United 238
West Ham United 182
Tottenham 170
Nottingham Forest 162
Barcelona 153
PSG 147.5
Manchester City 139.5
Bayern Munich 137.5
Wolves 137

-----

please log in to view this image

 

So, you're saying we've already bought our way into the top 8? Top 6 here we come.

 

They are licking Qatari hoop in advance of the free hospitality in November.

 

Imagine the crying if we'd signed as many players as Forest man

 

There would be a world record use of 'FFP' on social media and by the (incredibly unbiased) TV pundits.

 

Well.... You still spent more than us.

 

Who the **** are you?

 

Red Potato.

 

I guess that is gross spending. For net spend we are higher than Spurs, Wolves and Man City on that list.

The only EPL clubs with a higher net spend were Chelsea, Man United, West Ham and Forest.

 

City is always hard to say for sure because they fiddle with numbers, how much the club spends as opposed to how much sponsors are paying to bring in a player. You can be sure City's real net spend is higher.

 

Haaland is a good example. Given some of the prices paid for players by other clubs, Dortmund could easily have asked for double the amount City have reportedly paid. I don't get that one. It was obvious how good he is, so it seems like a bargain (in current terms).

 

Was a release clause wasn't it?

 

Ah right, may well have been.

 

That’s because we have no ****ers worth any money to sell.

 

PSG, AC Milan, Inter Milan, Roma, Juventus, Besiktas, Marseille and Monaco all being fined by EUFA for breaching FFP 'break even' rules.

19 other clubs (including Man City, Chelsea, Leicester & West Ham) told they will be closely monitored.

 

He had a release clause but there is addons which judging by his current goal scoring antics they will be payable rather quick.

 

Very true.
Although we do now.

 

Then Chelsea go and spunk £265m.

 

So long as they can prove their net income/outgoings meet the 'break even' rules. So they'll find a way to generate revenue.

 

How much is it including January?