But the view of the ECHR seems to be that these people can't easily be touched or deported, despite the fact that they are coming to this country uninvited and have no legal right to be here. If you entered most other countries in the world and were apprehended, you would probably be arrested, jailed, fined and then deported back here on the next flight out. But we aren't allowed to do this to these economic migrants, 90% of which are fit, healthy young men from a totally different culture to us and who have absolutely no right to be in this country. 12 illegals were also seen being dropped off on Slapton Sands beach in Devon yesterday and they apparently then ran to a waiting mini bus to presumably disappear into the black economy where they will probably end up working in Asian/middle eastern fast food restaurants, or some other poorly paid work, and will not contribute by paying tax or NI. Let's hope they are tracked down and locked up too.
A poster provided their opinion. Did you disagree with it? You asked what a female was. The answer is a girl or women, That is definition A. Definition B is then the defining biological characteristics of a female, girl or a women. You did not ask for definition B. You may disagree here. There is a out there odd ball school of thought that believes that a woman is a social construct. Earth to weirdoes, you cannot socially construct a female, girl or women, females are born.
if we leave ECHR then we do not have a court to go to was opinion I saw expressed!!?? it is not protecting them in so much as stating we are wrong to do it IF it were a non ECHR country they were going to then no recourse for them
?? I dont have an opinion. . A woman is literally a adult human female. A female is a girl or woman literally nothing else.110% nailed on literal facts. Your opinion doesnt change these facts.
Yes I know, I put that on another post. I still stand by getting the armed forces involved, as it feels like we're being invaded every day. Point a gun at a dinghy in the Channel and order it to turn around and go back. It will also send a clear message to the French that we're not putting up with this any longer.
That’s very black and white, Real life is much more nuanced than that. Language is fluid, it changes over time, definitions change to reflect that, but lag behind.
Biology is black and white in terms of the male and female species as a fetous during pregnancy and , has nothing to do with language changing or nuances! Anything after that is cosmetic and at the choice of the person; that is the difference. You are born either male or female, nothing else!
In my real life are you stating my mother, and then the mother of my children are not women, because their sex is fluid? Sex is not fluid, it is binary. You are a male or a female. Real life, its language recognises the meaning of sex. This exact language is law, it’s how we communicate and it’s how we relate to our world
do you??? There is no wider issue for me women are women adult human females. you think?? still waiting????
A few more for your to do list. A poster was: Being silly. Trolling. Both. Now its been turned back on them.
The literal meaning is as the dictionary, which I’ve never disagreed, which has been stated earlier. If there isn’t a wider issue then why do so many people wish to transition?. good question about the original Rwanda thread, it seems to have been hijacked
More questions for you what percentage of the population are trans? How many will transition and possess gender recognition certification? Easy this. This is not a wide issue. So many = miniscule. You did not answer the questions fomerly, that would be engagement and still don't.
