And you honestly believe that with millions of economic migrants (mostly male) wanted to come to the UK for a better life, that is going to stop them paying people traffickers when they can't get on your expanded refugee list? Cloud cuckoo land
Alastair Stewart The EHRC didn’t do much in Bosnia, Crimea or Ukraine either but it’s jolly good at stopping a legal government implementing its manifesto pledges.
It's almost as though you don't read what I say. The vast majority of those crossing the Channel are genuine refugees. There were 28,000 crossings last year, not 'millions'. If 80% were refugees, that makes less than 6,000 illegals, which is manageable. If we provide safe routes it would be clear that those that continue to use illegal alternatives are indeed economic migrants. By the way, the term 'economic migrants' is used as pejorative for people who just want to come here to earn a living. We're in need of more of these at the moment - particularly young, fit males.
yes 100%. Only nations not in it are Belarus and Russia, Russia only kicked out recently but it’s fine the U.K. can leave that and it leaves Johnson and co to have even less accountability and we know how trustworthy they are It’ll get pushed as nasty foreigners wanting to hurt the U.K. and people will lap that **** up. Meanwhile over time our and more importantly our kids rights will be eroded and big business can make more profits from them and their standards of living will deteriorate. some of us warned that leaving the Eu would see rights cut back… but were told it was project fear, rights to protest already taking a hit, more to come, if by some miracle the bootlickers eventually see what’s happening it’ll most likely be too late. Grrrr foreigners though.
I said there are millions of economic migrants wanting to come. We have over a million illegals already and as I've said, the numbers coming in are increasing exponentially. They come in having thrown away their phones and all identity papers. I do not believe most are not genuine asylum seekers ( backed up by border force officials who speak to them informally and confirm this). But with no identification, they're given the benefit of the doubt. You say, "if we provide safe routes, it would be clear that those that continue to use illegal alternatives are indeed economic migrants" Ok, my question to you is, what do we do with these economic migrants that you've identified, when they land?
It’s just something to firm up the Tory voter base and distract them from the daily **** ups, 4 bill on ppe up in smoke is easily ignored. it has no realistic benefits but it sounds good to them. If these people are risking the journey the small chance of being sent to Rwanda is just another small obstacle and won’t act as a deterrent, a very costly token gesture… so just standard Tory policy.
Seems I was right. An independent court. Would be stupid to distance ourselves even further than we already have but I suppose the tories are trying to claw back their UKIP support.
I see yet another of Johnsons ethics advisors has gone. Never understood why he ever needed one, the **** doesn't have any ethics!
does labour have a policy on illegal immigration should they ever get into power please log in to view this image Nadia Whittome MP @NadiaWhittomeMP No one is being deported to Rwanda tonight! This government will try again and our movement will stop them again. We cannot rest until all deportation flights are stopped, all the detention centres are closed, all the barbed wire is torn down.
Quote from Priti Patel today: “We will not stand idly by and let organised crime gangs, who are despicable in their nature and their conduct, evil people, treat human beings as cargo.“ I don't think it's right that a serving member of Cabinet should levy such criticism of her Government!!
please log in to view this image Andrea Reid please log in to view this image @AndreaR26537960 Home Office figures show that only 317 out of 16.5k of people that crossed the Channel had ID. The question for all those up in arms about Rwanda should be why are you willing to put your fellow citizens safety at risk?