Difficult to know who to believe though, isn't it? Media source after media source with their own version.
They spend less money on their military than what we do on an annual basis mate. Most of them are conscripts with **** aging equipment.
Russia big scary. Has been the narrative in the West for 70 ****ing years. It plays directly into our governments hands, because we get to spend $70B plus a year on our armed forces and no one bats an eyelid.
It genuinely is, but I have been chatting to you on here for years now and you never ever budge from an opinion because people tell you the contrary. If you want to think the UK is a weak country, your wrong, but your opinion doesn't make a difference
It's not even my opinion it's just the reality. They've got millions of personelle we've got about 250k We've got hundreds of tanks they've got thousands. Russia would swat Britain like a fly Only the US and possibly China are superior in terms of military strength.
You sat there and said we arent even close to them, while we rub shoulders with them in that very list. Youre saying as Russian convoys are being blown to smithereens on International television that they would swat a country with a stronger navy and airforce away like a fly. China and US are easily more powerful, not possibly. 3rd on every list, they cant take Kharkov. We took Helmand province. Their military frailties are on display for all to see and we're still chatting about them like we should be shaking in boots. Again. Same thing happened against Chechnya, Georgia and now Ukraine. British people simp syndrome is too strong.
Mate Ukraine are losing.. Ukraine is a huge country it'll take more than a handful of days to topple them, but the result is inevitable. Britain is one of the best trained militaries there is if not the best, but if you put Russia up vs Britain im afraid Britain would be absolutely destroyed.. I don't know why people care or argue otherwise. Look at the numbers
I said they'd swat Britain like a fly...I never said Britain weren't a respectable force. Look at the numbers mate
Any respectable force isn't getting swatted away like a fly. If you continue to use that term your arguing from a place of ignorance.
I stand by my comment because the numbers in every single military field are poles apart. If I say Russia would beat Britain with relative ease due it's overwhelming advantages in numbers and military strength would it would've taken longer than saying they'd swat Britain like a fly
With Russia's navy and airforce I don't think they'd even make it to the channel tbh. But if you wanna continue being wrong your allowed to post it all in here. But I would say Britains absolute barrage of unmanned drones and ballistic missiles don't come into it because that's not "personnel"
You're just wrong, you've been saying it for days now and no one has the effort in them on here to argue against you. But it's a factually incorrect statement, you're looking at numbers like Paul Merson and going "bang on da money m8, russha all day" but its looking at absolutely none of the key factors, unmanned equipment, missiles, modern equipment versus old, strategic differences. Russia can't just pour tanks over Britains borders like an alien onslaught from the 9th dimension. I don't think the UK would win, but it would take a strategic ******asion if we somehow let Russia win a war against us. Stalemate all day long.
CCs response "mate we wouldnt stand chance, custer custer, mate mate, custer, no chance what dont u understand mate mate." usual as
