tell it to the man who was in charge of prosecutions at the time , wait a minute isn't he now labour leader
It’s also meant that the nonsense accusation which has been rumbling around amongst certain demographics for a while and was sure to make an appearance come election time has been completely debunked, dismissed and disproven in the most public way possible.
how convenient for them, please post a link to this truth, as Starmer was in charge of prosecutions when the **** Saville came to light
If your referring to Johnstone the **** is a weasel and deserves the boot, however you could open your eyes to the rest of the corruption going on, Victims of '*****phile Labour MP' were 'brushed aside ... - Metro https://metro.co.uk › News › UK 19 Oct 2021 — Children who accused late Labour grandee Lord Janner of sexual abuse were 'let down by institutional failings', a damning inquiry ha Lord Ahmed: Former peer guilty of child sex offences - BBChttps://www.bbc.co.uk › news › uk-england-south-york... 5 Jan 2022 — Lord Ahmed of Rotherham is convicted of assaulting a young boy and a girl's attempted rape. Tom Watson criticised over role in bungled VIP abuse ... https://www.theguardian.com › politics › oct › tom-wat... 4 Oct 2019 — Intervention by Labour deputy leader left police officers 'in state of panic', says report. I was warned off asking Brittan what he knew about ... https://www.independent.co.uk › UK › UK Politics 7 Jul 2014 — Campaigning Labour member says Tory minister 'stepped out of the shadows' ... he knew about *****phile dossier, says Labour MP Simon Danczuk ...
why dont you read how many kiddie fiddlers are Labour it would help if you stopped reading far left rags like the guardian
I'm certainly not defending Labour MP's who have done wrong, but you can't paint Starmer with the same brush mate when it comes to Savile
They are all as bad as each other but it seems Labour had more kiddie fiddlers of high rank who are culpable than Tory this thread is nothing but attack tory but no reports on the corruption of both sides. as far as Starmer is concerned explain his money how he has amassed a fortune 7.7 million without corruption, and when he was in charge of prosecutions the Saville case came up why did he let him off the hook and not peruse it
He is behaving exactly like Trump did, he'll say anything to deflect from any criticism he is facing. He's the Prime Minister and should therefore hold Parliament and its traditions with utmost respect.
The sooner the lying twat is kicked out the better but so should Starmer based on your morals of right and wrong they are both lying twats, but strangely i see nobody baying for Starmers blood
