I'm not understanding a lot of the hate on here for some of the managers mentioned. I get that some are the current trendy thing but Ho'way man we currently have Bruce. So why do people have issues with the following? Genuine question as I must be missing something. Howe - One bad year with Bournemouth - Not Liverpool, City, Chelsea or Arsenal - Bournemouth. Lampard - Did alright with Derby, brought some youngsters through at Chelsea under a transfer embargo - What's up with him? I may be missing something. Gerrard - Okay he's only managed in Scotland but same could be said about Sir Alex Ferguson prior to Man Utd. Wilder - Did alright at first with Sheff Utd - then it went to ****. Rodgers - Came close with Liverpool, won the title in a one horse race in Scotland, won FA Cup with Leicester. Zidane - Man won the Champs League and has a legendary status in the game.
in order; Limited, no real track record, self proclaimed would get honesick. Rubbish, unproven cockney egotist. Rubbish, unproven scouse egotist. ****ing hell are you kidding? Decent manager, sees us as a step down though it would seem and wants the City job (and they want him). Usually hated, biggest egotist on the list, no track record. I think they need to get the advisors in place, appoint a sporting director then take the best course of action from there.
I think you're right mate.. I'd be happy with that.. I dunno why people are being snobby after saying they'd take anyone but Bruce for 2 years
I never said “anyone”. Go run along and grab the screenshots if you don’t believe me. Gerrard is an Ashley level appointment, so **** that.