He can marry in a Catholic church because his previous marriages were in non Catholic churches and are deemed not official by the Catholic church.So discrimination is acceptable by religions but not for anything else.
Off Topic OLOF's political thread
- Thread starter MIGHTY
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I thought I'd give you a day off
I can handle it mate
On a side note, have you seen the FA'S FA equality, diversity and inclusion (non job on 80k a year) director on sky babbling on sky talking absolute ****e about fans booing the players for taking the knee, she says they have a right and personal choice to take the knee and anyone who boos them are taking that right to protest and have a voice away, and they will support any individual who chooses to protest ....except the fans of course who pay hard earned money to go watch this total bollox, ****ing thick as pig **** ****. She only got the 'job' because.. well, have a guess.
80k a year? think you might be a little low on that one pal, look at that blonde piece on Sky golf, she is on over 200k a year ffs
I can handle it mate
On a side note, have you seen the FA'S FA equality, diversity and inclusion (non job on 80k a year) director on sky babbling on sky talking absolute ****e about fans booing the players for taking the knee, she says they have a right and personal choice to take the knee and anyone who boos them are taking that right to protest and have a voice away, and they will support any individual who chooses to protest ....except the fans of course who pay hard earned money to go watch this total bollox, ****ing thick as pig **** ****. She only got the 'job' because.. well, have a guess.
brisbane-lion
Well-Known Member
No I didn't see it OLOF. It's one rule for one and another rule for the other. They are missing the point, the fans aren't booing blacks, they are booing the symbol of kneeling to a group of marxist anarchists who are using the blm as a cover for their activities and fans are booing them because they condone the vandalising of war memorials and other Historical artifacts. I just change channel now when that ****e comes on, but then you've got nearly every ad which has a black in it.
I can handle it mate
On a side note, have you seen the FA'S FA equality, diversity and inclusion (non job on 80k a year) director on sky babbling on sky talking absolute ****e about fans booing the players for taking the knee, she says they have a right and personal choice to take the knee and anyone who boos them are taking that right to protest and have a voice away, and they will support any individual who chooses to protest ....except the fans of course who pay hard earned money to go watch this total bollox, ****ing thick as pig **** ****. She only got the 'job' because.. well, have a guess.
Exactly Shako,No I didn't see it OLOF. It's one rule for one and another rule for the other. They are missing the point, the fans aren't booing blacks, they are booing the symbol of kneeling to a group of marxist anarchists who are using the blm as a cover for their activities and fans are booing them because they condone the vandalising of war memorials and other Historical artifacts. I just change channel now when that ****e comes on, but then you've got nearly every ad which has a black in it.
Paul Joseph Watson sums it up perfectly on his youtube channel can't put the link up on my phone ill put it up for you when I get home from work.
I can handle it mate
On a side note, have you seen the FA'S FA equality, diversity and inclusion (non job on 80k a year) director on sky babbling on sky talking absolute ****e about fans booing the players for taking the knee, she says they have a right and personal choice to take the knee and anyone who boos them are taking that right to protest and have a voice away, and they will support any individual who chooses to protest ....except the fans of course who pay hard earned money to go watch this total bollox, ****ing thick as pig **** ****. She only got the 'job' because.. well, have a guess.
So overpaid players can make political gestures for ever more and the fans who pay their wages through the gate receipts,merchandise and Sky/BT subscriptions should go along with it? they can get ****ed booing will be part and parcel of the game for as long as this act carries on, it is also our right to protest as well.
As for trying to explain the meaning behind the kneeling don't bother, if a joke is told that can be misconstrued so that you have too explain its meaning, then it's a bad joke, in the same way this gesture has multiple meanings so therefore it's a bad idea.
Maybe you’ve got a point there
Let’s play “them at their own game”
Let’s play “them at their own game”
No I didn't see it OLOF. It's one rule for one and another rule for the other. They are missing the point, the fans aren't booing blacks, they are booing the symbol of kneeling to a group of marxist anarchists who are using the blm as a cover for their activities and fans are booing them because they condone the vandalising of war memorials and other Historical artifacts. I just change channel now when that ****e comes on, but then you've got nearly every ad which has a black in it.
You must log in or register to see images
The old Boleyn ground ehUp the 'ammers
Seeing as they are trying to change History and imparticular the colour of Historical figures , I bet the Beeb wouldn't make a program protraying the mythical prophet Muhammad as a homosexual.
Just a thought
FFS a young England cricketer has to apologise for tweets he made over 8 years ago because some saddo snowflake who trawled through his Historical tweets and found supposelly sexist and racist comments. FFS it's a sad sad era we live in.
Some of the historical shags Ive had are not nice either, but when its 10 to 2 and your only a kidFFS a young England cricketer has to apologise for tweets he made over 8 years ago because some saddo snowflake who trawled through his Historical tweets and found supposelly sexist and racist comments. FFS it's a sad sad era we live in.