Hard to believe that’s a hard woodBalsa wood more than likely

Hard to believe that’s a hard woodBalsa wood more than likely

Exactly, half time. Up and at em for the second half and we still have a chance. There will be change whatever the outcome, as we have an owner who is passionate and enthusiastic and wants success."Keep The Faith"......
And let's have the greatest singing of 'wise men say' that 10,000 fans can possibly sing.
Let's show our owner what he's really bought on Saturday.

That's not included in the data of his data driven approach!How can you keep a manager who keeps on losing matches ..?
Both of those clearance headers were weak and pathetic (Wright & Power). Get ya feffin boot through it maybe not Wright's but Power should have put his laces through it.We had a couple of chances to clear it and we didn't.
This all day long. Power is less mobile than O'Nien and also slows down our attacking play, also O'Nien is hungrier for goals and gets in better goalscoring positions.Fair play to Lincoln they deserved it.
I bet their average age is a lot lower than ours and they played like it. Are their young players better than ours? Maybe but judging by some of their shooting and crossing maybe not. Yet the young lad was fast and aggressive enough to close down Burge.
Once again if McGeady and Wyke have an off day we don't score. Tried and trusted formula that hasn't worked for quite some time.
Sick of banging on about it but O'Nien is probably the most composed player we have on the ball and the best at doing something useful with it in an attacking sense and not giving it away. Power should be at RB instead and Luke in midfield but is that bollocks going to happen, we're in play it safe mode.
My make-shift back four would be.I think we can score 2 or 3 goals...we have shown that, but I doubt very much our defence will keep a clean sheet, looks way too fragile
Absolutely. There's no reason at all we can't beat them by 2 goals at home. If you lose the first (away) leg of a playoff game 0-1, you go home thinking that you're still in with a chance, so a 0-2 you cannot rule anything out.Exactly, half time. Up and at em for the second half and we still have a chance. There will be change whatever the outcome, as we have an owner who is passionate and enthusiastic and wants success.
We KTF, have a warm glow remembering 6-in-a-row, oh yes and FTM
![]()
To me the last paragraph is the down side of your argument the players know that as well.Absolutely. There's no reason at all we can't beat them by 2 goals at home. If you lose the first (away) leg of a playoff game 0-1, you go home thinking that you're still in with a chance, so a 0-2 you cannot rule anything out.
To do that, the players need to show more hunger and we need at least one attacking player to offer something similar to McGeady. A reshuffle at the back is probably needed but bringing u23 players in to a high pressure game like could be a disaster both in terms of the result and their future careers.
However, even if we don't go up, its not the domesday scenario it might have been under Donald. We are at the very start of a massive rebuilding process and by the time next season comes around I expect us to be a very different side.
Maybe. I don't see that matters much though. We go up and rebuild in the Championship or we go up next season with a better team. The second option might actually be better in the longer term.To me the last paragraph is the down side of your argument the players know that as well.
I agree with most of that except the bringing under 23s in could ruin their career, why are we always looking for the negatives. Young players now have no fear and at youngers age he is ready for it, let be positive and believe in our young kids and give them a chance to show what they can doAbsolutely. There's no reason at all we can't beat them by 2 goals at home. If you lose the first (away) leg of a playoff game 0-1, you go home thinking that you're still in with a chance, so a 0-2 you cannot rule anything out.
To do that, the players need to show more hunger and we need at least one attacking player to offer something similar to McGeady. A reshuffle at the back is probably needed but bringing u23 players in to a high pressure game like could be a disaster both in terms of the result and their future careers.
However, even if we don't go up, its not the domesday scenario it might have been under Donald. We are at the very start of a massive rebuilding process and by the time next season comes around I expect us to be a very different side.
Totally agree mate one season building a proper team with most of these rubbish players binned will give us a much better chance in the future IMO.Maybe. I don't see that matters much though. We go up and rebuild in the Championship or we go up next season with a better team. The second option might actually be better in the longer term.
Depends on the individual I think, some are more able to cope than others. If it wasn't such a high pressure game I'd agree with you but I think chucking them in to this is a gamble. The way team selections have gone, especially at the back, there has to be some reason why they haven't been allowed to make the step up and the most obvious one is that their coaches don't think they're ready. With last night's centre back pairing being so error prone it is tempting to just give them a go.I agree with most of that except the bringing under 23s in could ruin their career, why are we always looking for the negatives. Young players now have no fear and at youngers age he is ready for it, let be positive and believe in our young kids and give them a chance to show what they can do
Depends on the individual I think, some are more able to cope than others. If it wasn't such a high pressure game I'd agree with you but I think chucking them in to this is a gamble. The way team selections have gone, especially at the back, there has to be some reason why they haven't been allowed to make the step up and the most obvious one is that their coaches don't think they're ready. With last night's centre back pairing being so error prone it is tempting to just give them a go.
I think we do need to change something. Especially up front and that's where we've got players, like Diamond, on the fringes. I think chucking in a totally untested centre back is a huge risk. Its Catch 22 because we do need to change something there.Thing is though, the coaches might be advising that they aren't ready but the first team players aren't coping or getting results. At least hoying a few young players in gives us a bit more pace, aggression, freshness. If we stick with the same team against Lincoln I really don't see us scoring three and keeping a clean sheet.
Tweaking things by playing Winchester instead of Scowen or Leadbitter instead of Power isn't going to cut it. It probably is unwise to change too much and play too many young players at this point but that's on Johnson, they should have been tried already because we've been slipping for ages with no sign of it turning around.
Tried is the operative word. Should have been having them on the bench and giving them half an hour here and there. If they're crap at least we tried it.