Off Topic "The Great Reset" hence the delusion of the masses

Answers or stay away - this is not a one way street.

 

Who the hell are you to tell me to ''stay away'' ? This is not your own private forum !

 

Correction: Stay away from me - was that clear enough. Get your own thread.

 

I have no interest whatsoever in you other than to operate as a counterweight to your own private little propaganda thread - I realize that is irritating for you ! However I do not see a host of others willing to debate this theme with you. But I will bow to your wishes here because I think that most on here see the dangers of your complete agenda already and know which political corner you come from. Our roads finish here - at least as far as this subject is concerned, because it is pointless debating with someone who thinks that every idea outside of his own narrow conspiracy theory has no basis - it's no more informative than debating with the flat earth society.

 

Today a letter from a Parliamentary advisor of the German Bundestag (ananymous) was published which has been translated from German into Englisch. It is worth reading it and a 2nd part will follow. So this is not "Butthuber" stuff nor did I write the text. (8 - 10 minutes read).

Warning to the population

Dear fellow citizens,

I am addressing you as an employee of the German Bundestag with the function of a parliamentary advisor. Through my work in Parliament, I am aware that important information in connection with the corona crisis is being withheld from people in our country, although this is of crucial importance for assessing the situation. Due to the enormous scope of recent events, I see it as my duty to my fellow citizens to publicly discuss these things.

Presumably, many will put this text aside after just a few lines, because they cannot imagine deliberately deceiving the population. I understand that, because I would have earlier dismissed such an idea as a “conspiracy theory”. But in the meantime, not least through my experiences in the Bundestag, I have had to recognize which methods are being used by governments, media and influential actors in the private sector around the world to the detriment of all of us and that unfortunately the population is too often too uncritical about this. I still hope that one or the other will at least check my hints.

Due to the worrying fact that critical voices in Germany are meanwhile being defamed, attacked and literally destroyed in their existence, I am forced to publish this letter anonymously. For the same reason, I cannot state my group membership. This does not play a role anyway, because we in Germany urgently need to learn again to listen to and respect each other “across camps”. If we don’t soon find our way back to such a togetherness, our society will finally split up into hostile groups. Unfortunately, dealing with Corona has already contributed to deepening the social rifts. In this respect, it is expedient for my concern to leave the information given by my group open. Evidence of my work in Parliament is attached at the end of the document.

You, dear reader, should only know the following about me: I am writing this report with sincere concern for the security, freedom and prosperity of all of us. These supporting pillars of our democracy are acutely endangered because the corona crisis is being instrumentalized from various sides and our legitimate concerns about the corona virus are being misused and exploited for foreign goals.

I have to emphasize at this point that I do not want to play down the health risks associated with the virus. Corona can be a serious danger, especially for older people as well as those with previous illnesses, this fact is undisputed. At the same time, however, I have to state that various actors with distorting reporting and horror images taken out of context are systematically spreading fear in the population and thus painting a picture of the pandemic that does not correspond to reality. The aim of these forces from politics, the global economy and the media is to divert attention from the far-reaching political and economic changes that are taking place in the background of the crisis and for which Corona comes “as called”.

Furthermore, in their fear of the virus, people should accept measures and permanent restrictions that are in no way justified in view of the situation and that go against the interests of the population. Much of this can be traced back to publicly available sources, but the actual goals of the measures are concealed from the public. I would like to inform you about this background with my report and I cordially invite you to review my remarks before this option is permanently denied you by broad censorship.

I.

The World Economic Forum WEF (a2), as the mouthpiece of the most influential international corporations and big banks, is instrumentalizing the crisis in order to implement a long-prepared agenda for the reorganization of the entire world economy (1). This “Great Reset” is sold to us as a change in globalization towards a sustainable economy, but this is a delusion. In fact, the actors of the WEF want to achieve the greatest possible centralization of political power in supranational institutions such as the UN, EU and the IMF, as well as to create completely new, supranational organs. Through these organizations, they want to permanently undermine the democratic control of the world economy and politics by elected parliaments, because from their point of view too many nation states have so far refused to bow to the privatization orgies of corporations and financial speculators.

In addition, one wants to displace the middle class once and for all and take over the freed up market shares as part of the “fourth industrial revolution”. For all of these goals, Corona and the associated global economic crisis are just the thing. The forces behind the WEF are therefore using their political influence to artificially prolong the crisis and to push ahead with the restructuring of the world economy according to their own agenda. So that the population and especially the middle class do not rebel against this dangerous development, the plan is wrapped in the heartwarming story of an anti-capitalist, humane restart of globalization and the desired shift in power is hidden behind sympathetic phrases like “global governance”.

But how credible is it when the very forces that have been making huge sums of money for decades through unprecedented overexploitation of nature suddenly appear in a green guise? The fact that even the highest-ranking representatives of the United Nations are promoting this global campaign by the corporate banking sector suggests, incidentally, an abuse of the UN for private-sector interests (2).

If enough people do not recognize the dangers of further concentration of power in the hands of a few in time and defend themselves against it, then we will soon find ourselves in a world in which our democratically legitimized governments have practically no decision-making power. This has long been the case in financial policy, which is why the redistribution from the hard-working to the rich is increasing unchecked. The highest representatives of the Bundestag have now announced that they will follow the plans of the corporations to further centralize political power. So they want to transfer the economic policy of all EU member states to the European Union “because of Corona”, as Bundestag President Schäuble recently announced.

However, one should not be under any illusions about who would actually benefit from an increase in power in Brussels: An economic policy at EU level would only serve the interests of transnational corporations such as Amazon, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs etc. – an unprecedented wave of privatization and deregulation the consequence. This orientation of the EU can already be seen, for example, in the facto tax exemption of digital companies and the privileging of the financial sector. Parallel to the shift in power to Brussels, the European governments are taking Corona measures to ensure that large parts of the SME sector can be bought up by corporations and financial investors as a result of the crisis. This approach corresponds to the agenda of the “Great Reset”. I therefore appeal in particular to all small and medium-sized entrepreneurs to defend themselves against these efforts.

II.

Digital corporations and governments around the world are instrumentalizing the fear of the virus in order to achieve social acceptance for comprehensive digital surveillance and control systems. These systems, which include contact tracking, digital identities, biometric face recognition and digital proof of immunity, are suitable for enabling totalitarian control of the entire population. In China, the full range of these inhumane technologies is already being used, resulting in even the simplest of citizens’ rights being restricted by AI-powered systems. A combination of a “Corona app” and a preliminary stage of digital proof of immunity is used there to completely automatically withdraw basic rights such as freedom of movement and assembly and to monitor compliance with the measures (3).

The 5G cellular standard enables this form of mass surveillance of every citizen in real time. In China, digital technology decides who is still allowed to leave their homes. Such a society can only be described as technocratic tyranny. Unfortunately, similar plans are also being pursued by our federal government: With the so-called “vaccination or immunity documentation”, it also wanted to grant people in our country their basic rights only if they can prove immunity, for example by means of vaccination (4) .

These intentions do not differ from those of the Chinese dictatorship and it is only thanks to public protest in Germany that the government has not yet passed its draft law in the original version. However, comparable systems have been working on at EU level for a long time, so the danger has not yet been averted (p3). With the “Covid-19-Health-Passport”, the World Economic Forum is already promoting a very similar technology with which access to public life is also to be made dependent on the use of digital control mechanisms. It can therefore be assumed that digital proof of immunity will be presented to us in the coming months by the media, government and representatives of digital corporations as a basic requirement for a return to normalcy.

In view of the coronavirus situation, I consider such massive coercive measures to be disproportionate and therefore join Edward Snowden, who warned against a worldwide architecture of suppression using digital technology that will outlast the crisis (5). If we allow digital systems to determine our freedom of movement and our access to public life, then at the same time we are handing over control of our most elementary fundamental rights to the private operators of the digital infrastructure.

One look at China is enough to recognize the real dangers of such a technocratic form of society. Nobody should have to live in such a world, but we are all increasingly being pushed in this direction as a result of too careless handling of what is technically feasible. This also applies to Europe, even if it may be difficult to imagine at first. The fact that the 5G network, in contrast to the previously private mobile communications infrastructure in Germany, is being built with a lot of taxpayers’ money, suggests in this context that this technology will primarily be used for state mass surveillance in our country (6).

It is a perfidious approach by the federal government that it now wants to implement these plans, which have been developed for many years, as part of a “Corona economic stimulus package”. In addition to the aspect of monitoring, it should not go unmentioned here that the digital corporations have long since been expanding their business model to include the education sector as part of the digitization of schools and Corona provides a welcome pretext for this. I appeal to all parents and teachers not to uncritically follow these endeavors. The possibilities for targeted influencing of children using digital technology were developed with enormous effort and represent a threat to the child’s well-being and individual freedom.

The introduction of digital identities was also sought before the corona crisis and was promoted by influential actors: The Rockefeller Foundation and Microsoft have been pursuing a project for digital, biometric recording of the world population with “ID2020” for several years, with digital proof of immunity also being a possible application for this totalitarian system can be described (7). A global vaccination campaign against Corona could soon serve as an excuse to roll out this control system that has been in preparation for years worldwide. If you also look at other projects of the digital corporations, you get the feeling that we humans tend to be more of a commodity or an economic v

III.

The financial sector and especially the major international banks are instrumentalizing the crisis in order to create new dependencies by granting enormous amounts of credit to states and companies and thus to expand their political influence. This is done either directly through the banks or indirectly through organizations such as the International Monetary Fund IMF. The acute need for capital as a result of the crisis makes the states open to blackmail for private donors. Because of this balance of power, any democratic control becomes impossible and the private banking sector becomes a political actor.

This approach is particularly fraudulent because the billions in loans are by no means used to support the population or the real economy, but instead, as in the 2008 financial crisis, mainly flow to the creditors of the member states. So politics does not save our economy with the borrowed money, but saves the financial sector from losses as a result of the crisis. At the same time, bank loans allow political influence. Because of these mechanisms, they have a strong interest in ensuring that the economic crisis as a result of the Corona measures is as devastating as possible. They therefore use the media channels open to them to spread fear and worsen the economic situation. In addition, through institutions such as the IMF or the World Bank, they are promoting a further shift in power in favor of supranational organizations, because this will further increase their ability to influence global financial policy.

The financial sector is already exerting great influence in foreign policy and in the global response to the corona pandemic, as the recent events in Belarus show, among other things: The IMF, as the long arm of the banking sector, offered the economically ailing state aid loans in the amount of money in June 2020 of 940 million US dollars and, in return, demanded that the small country also have to carry out corona measures such as lockdown, mask requirements and quarantine (12). The background to these demands was that Belarus disrupted the desired narrative of the deadly pandemic by its sober handling of the coronavirus. If one looks at the long list of countries that received IMF loans as part of the corona crisis, a similar approach by the Monetary Fund appears conceivable in these countries (13). Lukashenko rejected the interference of the IMF, we can currently see the consequences for him and his government.

With this approach, the financial sector, with the support of the media, and in this case the EU, tries to ensure that no state opposes the agenda or its own goals. The fact that the OSCE refused Belarus’ invitation to observe the elections on site with poor reasoning shows that the sanctions that are now being prepared are not really about the conduct of the possibly rigged elections (14).

In addition to the political aspects, the financial sector is abusing the crisis in order to push ahead with the long-awaited global cash abolition. Unfortunately, many people are not aware of the effects the switch to digital currencies would have and the enormous potential for abuse associated with it. At this point, I encourage everyone to deal with the actual consequences of a cashless society and, in particular, to internalize the power that the operators of a global, digital payment infrastructure could exercise over the entire population.

Influential forces who had been lobbying intensively for the global cash abolition before Corona are now taking advantage of the crisis for their own purposes. That this also applies to Microsoft founder Bill Gates is only mentioned in passing at this point (15). In view of the enormous economic potential in this sector, it is in any case unlikely that these actors are ultimately concerned with anything other than money and political influence, even if they hide this behind high-profile “philanthropy”. So if we are told that we have to forego cash because of Corona, then we shouldn’t ignore the strong economic interests behind it.

All in all, based on my observations in the Bundestag, I come to the conclusion that the financial sector influences politics with an astonishing degree of naturalness and can now even position its own staff in the highest political offices without there being any public protest. If Goldman Sachs managers or IMF chairmen can become president of the European Central Bank, the EU has obviously lost all proximity to the needs and interests of the people. And if BlackRock representatives in Germany seriously acted as candidate for chancellor.

 

It should be stated here for anyone still reading this drivel that the preceding text can only be found on www.armstrongeconomics.com - nowhere else can this be found. It is, of course, an anonymous letter - meaning nobody can actually check its authenticity. Strange also that such a thing can only be found on a site with a reputation for producing fake news - produced by Martin Armstrong, himself a once convicted felon for fraud and embezzlement. Nowhere else can any evidence of this letter be found - strange really.

 

Masks Symbolize Our Enslavement

The COVID-19 virus' size has been reported to be 80, 120 or 150 nanometers (Britannica).

The best mask (3M) cannot stop particles smaller than 300 nanometers (0.3 microns).

If you're still not convinced, here you find links to peer-reviewed research which concludes face masks are useless and dangerous

Mask harm:

• 
  
  
  • Decreased oxygen intake (PubMed)
  • Increased toxic CO2 uptake (video 1 below)
  • Increased inhalation of toxic chemicals from the mask
  • Increased pathogen intake: the moist and warm mask fibers are an ideal breeding ground for pathogens.

CO2 measurements inside a mask. [full screen]
Panel of 100+ doctors vote masks to be unnecessary and harmful. [full screen]
Implications:

The government:

• 
  
  
  • mandates masks while they don't work.
  • violates the constitution & human rights.
  • forces you to harm your own health: a crime against humanity.
  • claims you cannot do with your own body what you want.
    • A dangerous precedent that will undoubtedly continue when the vaccines arrive.

Masks as social engineering tool.

Create fear, division, separation, and dehumanization
When we see people wear masks, we think there's a real threat. Mask wearers might be infected. People without masks might infect us. Regardless if there's a pandemic or not, when we go out on the streets, it certainly looks like there is one. As such, it reminds us every time and propagates fear throughout societies. Fear weakens the immune system.

Mask wearing creates a great division in the population. Often, mask wearers attack those that won't, verbally and even physically.

Face masks cover our mouths and noses and rob us of our individuality and expression. They block us from truly connecting to the people we talk to. I surely feel like I'm talking to a masked robot, zombie or slave.

Historically a muzzle for slaves:

In the past, mouth masks were used to punish and silence slaves. The psychos behind the scamdemic must be pissing themselves, seeing people putting it on themselves, only because they believe the propaganda.



...to be continued.

 

Tomorrow I will give an outlook on how the following months will develop and what the target of Big Finance is.

 

And the recent contribution (text 187) is taken from www.beforeitsnews.com - a website that hosts user-submitted content and regularly publishes false information and conspiracy theories. www.newsguardtech.com actually has a warning about this web site which says - Warning - Proceed with caution: This website severely violates basic standards of credibility and transparency.

 

Bedtime stories for sleepwalkers

http://www.weforum.org/great-reset

http://www.id2020.org/alliance

http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/

http://www.betterthancash.org/members

 

Well that has been an interesting read before bedtime. From reading through the past ten pages, what strikes me most is that we can't help but feel quite afraid at times like this. Scared for our jobs, our financial security, our loved ones and indeed our own health/lives. As Butthuber has consistently and persistently argued, the powers that be in the world, be they Governments, Freemasons or a few wealthy billionaires, are all out to gain even more control, power and influence over us 'little people'. I guess the question that keeps going round in my head is why? Why would Governments or billionaires want to kill now over a million people, wipe billions from the value of businesses and cause financial difficulties for millions of individuals. Seems to me like they are pretty comfortable already.

Off course you'll call me naive, uneducated and not well read...and I'd concede that the last point is fair. I am not well read on this topic, I am well read when it comes to the Lee Child novels which I thoroughly enjoy, or Terry Hayes' 'I Am Pilgrim' which I have recently finished. I am not well read on reports written about control of the masses, or conspiracy theories about whatever the latest hot topic is. I reckon obsessing and, as you have eluded to, gathering and reading vast numbers of articles and books about conspiracy theories will only lead to you seeing conspiracy where there is none.

For the record, I am not being blindly positive or optimistic about this. As a freelance worker, I have seen my income drop by around 70% from this time last year...and I have spent a lot more of this year sat in my apartment than I had planned to. Having felt, albeit in a small part, some of the impact of Coronavirus, here is my theory...for some reason, a virus has emerged from a less than hygienic source, and that virus has had an unforeseeable devastating impact across the world. Doctors are fighting to keep people alive, researchers are working tirelessly to find a vaccine and Governments are governing as best as they can. Yes doctors are making mistakes, researchers are taking longer than perhaps first hoped and Governments across the world have had different responses, and there have been plenty of mistakes along the way. However, if we let conspiracy produce fear, that fear will only cause more unrest and disturbance.

So, I guess my question for you Butthuber is, and this is a genuine question...what do you suggest we do? Not wear our enslaving masks and refuse to follow Government advise, and go back to life as it was this time last year?

 

Reacher books are brilliant.

 

To be honest BH, I find this argument a bit silly. Why not wear a mask if it’s the polite thing to do ? I’m really not convinced that they do much good, however I don’t see the problem in wearing one.....a bit like putting my hand over my mouth when sneezing.......it’s just polite and courteous to others.
All this stuff about symbolising enslavement really doesn’t do it for me.

 

read two
the second was just to see if the first was as bad as I thought it was

I am pilgrim was a great read

reading jo nesbo stuff now

do we have a book thread

 

Agree the Reacher books are a bit repetitive, but very relaxing and easy reading. 'I am Pilgrim' was one of those books I was both totally gripped by, but also not wanting to carry on reading as I knew then I'd finish it.

 

Actually Kiwi.
That is a brilliant idea...
Go for it

 

We have a review thread.

 

A good post Dave. I am well prepared to believe that there is a powerfull elite which are working to find out how to use this crisis for their own benefit - this is normal, but it is a completely different thing to suggest that the whole crisis was a fabrication created by them. It's also difficult to understand how an elite would want to destroy the system by which they became so powerfull. Freelance workers have been amongst the worst hit by this thing - my own income has gone down pretty much parallel to yours compared to last year. Unfortunately you are not the first to ask Butthuber what he would actually do to solve this crisis, and it is becoming obvious that no answer will be forthcoming. The truth is that the conspiracy theorists do not want this crisis to end because that would destroy their own theories. It is in their interests to keep this going for as long as possible - hence the throwing away of masks and all social distancing. You may find that this hidden deep state elite are not the only people using this crisis for their own benefit.

 

Good Morning Dave(Rangers),

you are the first one who is asking the right questions - thanks for that !

1 . Why would Governments or billionaires want to kill now over a million people, wipe billions from the value of businesses and cause financial difficulties for millions of individuals. Seems to me like they are pretty comfortable already.

We need to understand that the start of a depopulation program was in 1972 when the CLUB OF ROME (international thinktank) published the alarmist “LIMITS TO GROWTH” document, warning of world wide over-population and the need for “Sustainable Development”. This was the beginning of the slow process of social engineering and programming people to accept that the planet is “struggling” to sustain life.

On October 8th, 1973 the New York Times reported a quote from TED TURNER, also a MEMBER of the CLUB OF ROME, “The social experiment in China under chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”

Ted Turner was also quoted in 1996 as saying “The total population of 250 to 300 million people is ideal. That means a reduction of 95% from present levels would be even more ideal. Anyone who abhors the China one child policy is simply a dumb dumb." On July 7th 1998 the Baltimore Sun reported that most of Ted Turner’s first donation to the UN of 22 million dollars went to programs that seek to stall population. Another goal of the depopulation process is that the upcoming generation will submit to sterilization to save mother Earth.

In 1992 came the Earth Summit, which produced the document called the EARTH CHARTER. This document was co-written by MAURICE STRONG, long time globalist elitist and member of the CLUB OF ROME and MIKHAIL GORBATJOV. Both Strong and Gorbatjov stated that “it was hoped that this document would be adopted as the new Ten Commandments, with Environmentalism as the new ONE WORLD RELIGION.” Out of this summit came Agenda 21.

In 1992 former US president GEORGE BUSH Sr. said “Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require profound re-orientation of human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and the individuals, in an unprecedented re-deployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level.”

Cutting through the code, everyone should consider what “profound re-orientation of human society” and “unprecedented re-deployment of human and financial resources” actually means. For everyone not familiar with Agenda 21, this is the beginning of the learning curve, not the end.

In 1992 MAURICE STRONG, Secretary General of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said “It is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning and suburban HOUSING are NOT SUSTAINABLE.”

Put those statements together with the previous one and it must become clear that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food and where we even live. The new Agenda 2030, succession of Agenda 21, is only more specific but is all about depopulation as suggested in 1972.

Believe it or not, they do not need that many people anymore - that is what they meant with 4IR (4th Industrial Revolution).

If you need more information on that topic I will be more than happy to provide those.

2. Off course you'll call me naive, uneducated and not well read...and I'd concede that the last point is fair. I am not well read on this topic, I am well read when it comes to the Lee Child novels which I thoroughly enjoy, or Terry Hayes' 'I Am Pilgrim' which I have recently finished. I am not well read on reports written about control of the masses, or conspiracy theories about whatever the latest hot topic is. I reckon obsessing and, as you have eluded to, gathering and reading vast numbers of articles and books about conspiracy theories will only lead to you seeing conspiracy where there is none.

It is not about education or well read - it is all about an open mind. As I have repeatedly said, my personal awakening started in 2007/2008 and of course at first you start reading almost everything that is different to mainstream media. I had a long learning curve being able to distinguish propaganda from real facts. My wife believed me from day one on but we had many arguments about WHEN all these things might happen - she didn´t want to leave the comfort zone for a long time. Since then we have gradually changed our lifes aknowleding that there are many people who realise that what I have told them is starting to become real - but of course, most people don´t want to hear it and are afraid to meet me, that´s just the way it goes. Most important to me is that my wife and I are tightly knit - finally she had understood what was coming and we are prepared. By the way, best preparation is mental stability.

3. For the record, I am not being blindly positive or optimistic about this. As a freelance worker, I have seen my income drop by around 70% from this time last year...and I have spent a lot more of this year sat in my apartment than I had planned to. Having felt, albeit in a small part, some of the impact of Coronavirus, here is my theory...for some reason, a virus has emerged from a less than hygienic source, and that virus has had an unforeseeable devastating impact across the world. Doctors are fighting to keep people alive, researchers are working tirelessly to find a vaccine and Governments are governing as best as they can. Yes doctors are making mistakes, researchers are taking longer than perhaps first hoped and Governments across the world have had different responses, and there have been plenty of mistakes along the way. However, if we let conspiracy produce fear, that fear will only cause more unrest and disturbance.

I am a freelance myself who´s business was running perfectly all those years and I had also a drop of income by around 40 %. So far I was lucky that the business of one of my biggested clients is still running smoothly AND I that can do lots of my work remotely - Home office is just fine with me even though I really miss the travelling a bit.

This is a major aspect. I had mentioned the official document of the Rockefeller Foundation (2012) and the "Event201" p(l)andemic exersise that took part in October 2019. I had also published a document of the BMI (German Ministry of the Interior) where they stated to "intentionally fearmonger". I also published the link to the EU that has the vaccination plans till the end of 2022 ready - that document originates from 2019 !

All the hysteria about a virus that didn´t kill more people compared to a normal flu (I had provided all the statistics). On the contrary - they have lied to the people with all the wrong numbers (they needed the high numbers to keep up the story and lead us through the Summer so that they can restart this autumn). Once more again, a PCR test is not validated and not the appropriate tool they used. Kary Mullis who invented the PCR technique was laughing about the fact that this method had been used for the virus (just look it up).

Wearing masks has got nothing to do with showing respect to other people - it is outright stupid (sorry about the strong word). They do not help at all but are very bad for your health if you wear them over a longer period. It is especially dangereous for children and elderly people. Keeping at distance 1,5 meters is the more appropriate approach with is common knowledge how to behave during an "ordinary" flu.

Perhaps you remenber going to the hospital before that p(l)andemic began. Nobody was wearing a mask apart from doctors during an operation. You could even go to the emergency room and nobody had to wear a mask - how come ?

Did you never ask yourself why football was restarted, hugging each other, whereas some people had to wear masks whereas others didn´t. Why is it allowed to meet 5 - 6 people and not just 3 - 4 ? Is there any study out there telling us that a certain number of people can only meet - of course not. That is outright nonsense and just measures keeping us busy by distracting us from what it really happening around us. That is no conspiracy theory - that is just logic and a clear mind.

4. So, I guess my question for you Butthuber is, and this is a genuine question...what do you suggest we do? Not wear our enslaving masks and refuse to follow Government advise, and go back to life as it was this time last year?

We are in the endgame right now and first thing we need to do is to prepare ourselves first ! It´s like the safty instructions on the plane where they advise you to use the oxygen mask first before helping others. Next step would be to question the measures that have been taken. Whenever possible I do not wear the mask but try to avoid too many discussions with people that are really afraid of the virus. It is impossible to help those people and I do not want to persuade them. People make a big mistake if they believe that they will have their old life back by just obeying what the Government says - that is just not the agenda they have to follow. I will write more about the hierarchy and who is has to follow orders later today.

 

https://theconversation.com/coronav...erous-heres-how-to-stop-them-spreading-136564

It appears to me we need a different kind of innoculation.