Off Topic OLOF's political thread

FFS there'd be no one left.

 

or paddy, mick, jocko, potato eater etc etc.

 

Shaks, it's a hate term, and recognised as such under the law. He's put it in print, not exchanging jocular remarks in the pub. Even you must realise that he has an agenda.

It comes down to how & why it's used, & by whom. Sadly for the bold captain, he has a litany of abuse available to view on here by the authorities. Any one post on it's own might not make a case, but with his track record, even Inspector Clouseau could wrap this up without getting out of his chair.

 

.

Fair point, but it's your Irish privalige to get racist abuse, joke. Fair few pots calling the kettle black.

 

Can we also ban anyone who calls me a(white privalaged racist) for refusing to join black Marxist supporters.

 

Corrected.

 

Aren't you?

 

So if you add stani on the end it's not a hate term. Just asking.

 

That what annoys me Chesh, why do certain ethic groups have the monopoly on racism. Personally I take the Irish/Paddy/Mick bashing as slagging. But like you say there are some posters with short memories.

 

IMO it's no different from calling me a pom, you a paddy or Jock a Jock maybe we should ban him for calling himself Whitejock , should be pale pinkjock

 

Sorry for the intrusion but that post drew my attention, and FWIW, if he posted that on the PL board, he’d be in the ****ing bin.

Little Legs Lennon is nothing but a grifting, coke snorting, racist thug, who’s never exposed anything. Only morons who don’t actually bother reading the news think that the bloke ‘exposed’ a grooming gang whilst filming outside the court they were actually being tried and found guilty in.

 

While he may not of exposed them, he makes sure they get charged, while some MPs want people to accept rape if its done by Muslims.

 

yes that’s correct.
Not an opinion.
Legally tested in a court of law.
There is a risk that banter may be seen as racist material and there is a fine line but it’s clear there is no banter in what LL posted.
I will not be engaging in heightism or potentially racist banter following returning from my ban. As I didn’t get banned for multiple accounts it must have been for comments that were inappropriate and I have accepted that, so just to be clear there are no double standards here.

 

Bucks has beaten me to it.

This isn't the 1970's LL, words such at Pa*i are unacceptable in 2020.

Whilst I'm sure we all agree that grooming gangs should be put to sleep, your blind far right views spoil your argument.

 

I know many older people who say Paki, it's what they were brought up with, and used on tv many a time until recently, many don't even realise it's not acceptable, but no more so than many other nationality names on here.

 

I am disappointed that you seek to justify it. Sorry we are not going to agree on this. It’s every bit as bad as the N word and I don’t mean Norwich.

 

He literally filmed from outside the court they were already appearing in. So this ^ is demonstrably untrue. He had precisely nothing to do with exposing this issue. He merely used the issue to promote his race hate towards Muslims. There’d literally been an inquiry into the entire issue years before he supposedly ‘exposed’ it.

 

You got banned for stabbing in the back, the guys who were holding the rope to stop you falling down the mountain.

 

You're talking one case, he has exposed many not one. While government members have been trying to cover it up.

 

Name one.