I mainly remember Jardine because he defended throwing bananas at black players. Think that says a great deal.
Abusing blacks, women and Muslims is fine with Jardine ... ... although gays are exempt after his Grindr account was posted on RTG
Right, based on all the analysis from Kittenmittons, Bob Cheval and all, it looks like it is as simple as that. Except I read the ES price was reduced to 37M from 40M. The SD sale price will be the best deal SD can negotiate between 35M-40M (which includes 25M for payback of the 25M from Madrox to SAFC), or 10M-15M if the buyer just assumes the debt (say by buying Madrox). I know I'm repeating what others have said, but I want to make sure I finally understand this!
Someone who knows him posted a photo that was inadvertently linked to a listing on a gay dating forum .... ... Jardine tried to laugh it off as banter from his mates
From what I've read on here, yes. I don't now why FPP would close their UK company if they are still interested, but that's different than the price assumptions.
Just had a quick look at who were among the first gloaters, on the equivalent RTG thread, and it couldn't be more predictable. Phil, SAFC 2012, Jardine, Abu Dhabi, etc straight on dripping out their tedious drivel ... ... and equally predictable, they've now vanished or throwing up smokescreens. Absolutely cringing behaviour from people claiming to be Sunderland supporters ... ... if most people like them were supporters I wouldn't want to be.
Whichever one sees us produce a proper League 1 winning team if we don't go up this season and genuine investment in the squad once in the Championship either way. I know everyone wants new ownership, but it really has to be someone happy to part with many millions. As rumoured, many of the previously interested parties just planned to go straight into high debt to generate the funding to invest in the team. It wouldn't be as high obviously but I'm not sure how Id feel about that with the Ellis Short £160m debt still fresh in the memory
Have been told over there that the Echo are not a reliable source and that FPP did not attend a board meeting in December
Methven said it happened for what it's worth. How would anyone able to claim someone wasn't there unless they knew someone who was ... ... or were there themselves?
I've been told it's so Donald can't use this as a lever against another potential buyer which is what he was doing.
I am of the opinion that I believe something is true until it is proved to the contrary that it isn't. I do not have to prove my innocence in court, the prosecution must prove that I am guilty
Some people are just desperate to run the club down, they don't care about facts or proof mate ... ... how sad must it be to be them eh?
When you get back on there after a ban you realise what a bunch of absolute bellends get on there. Most of the twats go on ignore now, can't be chewed reading their ****e patter tbh.