I believe he's using his sons death for political gain, yes. Why is he out speaking to the media every day and dragging reporters with him to confront Conservative MP's? Why isn't he at home grieving like any normal father would be doing? How many other parents of folk killed in terrorist incidents have gone political like this? I'll probably get slammed for this post, but it's true, in my opinion.
My god ! ! ! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE anyone undecided, not sure, think it’s not worth voting ‘ coz thet’re all the bloody same’ Watch this vid. If it wasn ‘t so sad it would be funny. Again please watch this.
When you guys go to the polling station, remember that Jeremy Corbyn sided with the same people that have killed British soldiers and citizens. Please don't trample on their dead bodies by putting a cross next to that mans name.
But how can you take this video seriously? It's just some loon ranting and swearing. There's no balance, it massively glosses over the reasons for austerity, and makes huge assumptions. Boris is awful, yes. We don't need that pointing out but Corbyn is equally as awful. He's been proven to be a liar on several occasions and he's a huge hypocrite. His desire to be in No. 10 is just as huge as Boris and has lead to him conveniently forgetting his previous stance on Europe (and there are question marks surrounding his stance on climate change) and then there's his climbdown on his attitude towards things like the queen. He is just as guilty of using tragic events as political capital- always first on the scene making a fuss.
The no train seat thing. The NHS 'sale' document doesn't actually say what he says it does. He told Andrew Neil that he's never met the IRA. And then there's the thing about him being instrumental in the NI peace deal- he wasn't, he just voted for it, as did pretty much every other Labour MP at the time. Although to be fair to him, it's his supporters who make that claim, not him himself.
So he actually met Andrew Neil at last a leader who will? And the nhs document is that not interference from Russia allegidly ( maybe need to check with Trump)
Neil - BB will not have a one to one with him or Julie Etchingham why? NHS - Trump said a while ago it was all on the table - the nhs 'sale' document is reported to have been from Russian interference hence ask Trump
I don't know why Johnson won't do an interview with Neil. Perhaps because he's an idiot. Like I said, I think they're both awful. I'm not sure what your point about Russia is. It still doesn't say what Corbyn says it does. The 'all on the table' thing has been explained. The private sector have always supplied services to the NHS.
Jeremy Corbyn sides with terrorists and all Labour supporters can come back with is Boris Johnson won't do a TV interview with somebody. Not really in the same league, imo.
The nhs 'sale' document that you introduced that was leaked is suggested to have been edited/leaked by a russian website. The 'all on the table' thing is a quote from Trump https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...theresa-may-press-conference-uk-a8943656.html Theres a clue
Why don't you put his recent comment up? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50638110 Donald Trump has insisted the US wants "nothing to do" with the NHS in post-Brexit trade talks as he sought to repudiate opposition claims that the health service would be "up for sale". Boris Johnson said the Conservative election manifesto had "categorically ruled out" any NHS services, or drug prices, being up for negotiation. In June, the US president suggested the health service would form part of negotiations over a possible future trade deal after the UK leaves the EU, saying: "When you're dealing in trade, everything is on the table." But speaking on Tuesday morning as he and other world leaders prepared for a summit to mark the 70th anniversary of Nato, he issued a different message. "I don't even know where that rumour started," he told journalists. "We have absolutely nothing to do with it. If you handed it [the NHS] to us on a silver platter, we want nothing to do with it."
But what has the Russian leak got to do with the document being shown to not say what Corbyn says it does? The 'all on the table' statement has been shown to be American policy- they make the assumption that they can access all areas for trade purposes unless it's been specifically stated that the country in question does not want to negotiate trade deals associated with that aspects of its economy.
How does this fit then; A Conservative parliamentary candidate has defended a controversial fringe view that people with learning disabilities should be paid less than the minimum wage because “they don’t understand money”. Sally-Ann Hart was heckled as she made the remarks at a Hastings and Rye constituency hustings on Thursday evening, where she is vying to defend the Tories’ wafer-thin majority after Amber Rudd stood down. A furore ensued after Hart, a councillor in East Sussex, was challenged over an article she had shared on Facebook that said “people with learning difficulties should be allowed to work for less than the minimum wage”. “It was about people with learning difficulties,” she told the crowd. “About them being given the opportunity to work because it’s to do with the happiness they have about working … Some people with learning difficulties they don’t understand about money. That is what you are voting for - your concience not mine and regarding the "all Labour supporters can come back with is Boris Johnson won't do a TV interview with somebody." A: I am not a Labour supporter B: I do not like missinformation/shady tactics/ or manipulation by the right wing press And that is my beef
