Has this on the front page.. https://www.skysports.com/boxing/ne...youtube-rivalry-explained-ahead-of-la-rematch Two people who argued online had a fight and sky sports are covering it? What a load of ****e.
Great isn't it. Half the content on the Daily Mail is stories based on what random people are saying on social media.
Daily mail lol The most sued toilet paper in the uk ( that must tak some beating after the Star & the Sun lol )
I work for Sky, the sad thing about why this has been box officed is that there are something like 150 million subscribers between these 2 ****ers. Its absolute bullshit, but commercially it’s a ****ing goldmine. Don’t be surprised if this takes in more money than the Canelo or Joshua fights. It’s a crazy, ****ed uo world.
I ended up watching the documentary on it tonight for lack of anything better to do, none of them are likeable and of course it's daft to act like YouTube twats are legitimate boxers but the fights were entertaining enough. At least unlike high profile fights in pro boxing you can tell they're desperate to knock each other out and they're not looking for a draw for the rematch. Even if that was exactly what ended up happening neither of them wanted it. Also while Sky airs WWE with a straight face literally anything else is more legitimate. World farting championships would have more credibility.
Blows my mind that there’s hundred of millions of people watch people on YouTube doing nothing. There’s folk who watch other folk play computer games? Why? I don’t get it at all. I used to like climbing trees and breaking windows with footballs like. Then I liked beer and the match and tiddys. Still do. Not the trees and windows. I don’t wanna watch folk doing things I could just go and do. Other than porn, but that’s a different pot of bits.
