1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 22nd October)

Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by ellandback, Oct 22, 2019.

  1. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    30,853
    Likes Received:
    20,719
    Better ban you then <laugh>

    Him and blueprick were always gutted when Leeds won. Not Leeds fans and there's a reason they get banned from every site they have been on.
     
    #41
    Alf Hooker likes this.
  2. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    Just checked out Clive's profile. 61 likes for 98 posts, then banned after 12 days.

    Can't have been that much of a WUM, can he?

    Or perhaps the snowflakes don't like it up 'em?
     
    #42
    FORZA LEEDS likes this.
  3. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    30,853
    Likes Received:
    20,719
    How many of the likes were Bluememe Though, And he wasn't Leeds for a fact,as he admitted he was a wum on the old bbc606 when TC stitched him with the gay porn.
     
    #43
    Alf Hooker likes this.
  4. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    I wasn't party to that. I can only judge him for his posts on here. And they were just fine & dandy. Nothing ban-able about them. As I recall, there was an assumption that he was Bluememe. That's the only reason he got banned, unless someone can tell me otherwise.
     
    #44
    FORZA LEEDS likes this.
  5. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    30,853
    Likes Received:
    20,719
    Well if he was Bluememe then he definitely wasn't a Leeds fan.
     
    #45
  6. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    It was alleged, but never proved that Clive was Bluememe. Just like it was alleged that Glory was everyone & his brother, but never proved.

    i'm talking about Clive, not Bluememe, btw, so why keep mentioning him?
     
    #46
  7. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    30,853
    Likes Received:
    20,719
    Well because even if they weren't the same person, they were definitely a double act.
     
    #47
  8. ellandback

    ellandback Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    60,597
    Likes Received:
    33,256
    That is true, including MOT
     
    #48
  9. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,712
    Likes Received:
    28,026
    They would log in and out within minutes of each other, even at the weirdest of times, either the same or family/friends and they were certainly a double act.
     
    #49
  10. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    30,853
    Likes Received:
    20,719
    Agreed and they always were, going back to bbc606.
     
    #50

  11. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    So Clive was guilty of associating with Bluememe. That's the reason he was banned? Really?
     
    #51
  12. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    And this is a banning offence? One deserves the ban & the other gets banned 'cos he appears to associate with him? Really?
     
    #52
  13. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,712
    Likes Received:
    28,026
    I didn’t say that’s why he/they were banned, just agreeing with Cheesh that something wasn’t right in the fact they were a double act when it came to WUM
     
    #53
    Alf Hooker and lifecheshirewhite like this.
  14. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    But the whole point is that Clive wasn't WUMing. He was well received by most. 61 likes for 98 posts doesn't suggest that the majority wanted him strung up, does it? But so far, the only suggestion I've had here is that he was guilty by association.
     
    #54
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2019
    FORZA LEEDS likes this.
  15. FORZA LEEDS

    FORZA LEEDS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    13,000
    Likes Received:
    20,244
    Maybe just Bluememe should have been banned as he was the obvious WUM and brought nothing to the forum?

    Whereas Clive did actually contribute quite a lot and I never found his posts annoying.
     
    #55
    Whitejock likes this.
  16. ellandback

    ellandback Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    60,597
    Likes Received:
    33,256
    #56
    lifecheshirewhite likes this.
  17. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    30,853
    Likes Received:
    20,719
    Wasn't a Leeds fan IMO, Leeds fans are happy when we win, he wasn't.
     
    #57
    ellandback likes this.
  18. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    30,853
    Likes Received:
    20,719
    In your opinion he wasn't wuming,others though he did nothing but wum and the 61 likes could still be from Bluememe.
     
    #58
  19. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    And what has that to do with his activity on here? 61 likes for 98 posts, then you banned him after 12 days on here. Why?
     
    #59
  20. Whitejock

    Whitejock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    19,051
    So give us some examples of this WUMing that so horrified you, snowflake. :)

    It must be memorable if you wanted him banned. Hope you got appropriate counselling. <whistle>
     
    #60

Share This Page