Greta Thunberg

.

Well here's the thing
I am engaging with you and you are failing to respond. Preferring to pass me on to your prophets instead.

Let me help you by pressing simplify.

Name one fact that shows the earth has gained sufficient mass since the dinosaurs to cause a significant increase in gravity.

I would like a link to the evidence to support it.

Thanks

 

Haggy did go a bit mad at the all you can eat buffet at the Jaipur Jewel at the weekend? ...

 

You cannot even define gravity.

 

Bisto

 

Ahhhhhh

 

What's your definition?

 

Yes, he had me going too

 

How are the Establishment suppressing his work?

Have you got a link to an alt right site that says so?

 

@Looney Leftie seems to know his stuff Haig picked the wrong fight.

 

I can measure it and I can calculate it's effect based on the mass of objects and their distance apart.

Now will you answer my question?

 

There isn’t one.

Not even Newton could define it.

 

Define mass.

 

So how can you say that gravity is twice as strong now as when the dinosaurs were around if there's no definition of it?

 

But you said yourself in an earlier post that V got the temperature wrong too.

I had a mate with too much time on his hands who believed all this guff for a while.

When he came to his senses (he suffered from loneliness, low self esteem, depression) he said he felt as stupid as a ten year old who is the last person in the class to realise Santa is not real.

He was that kid too

 

They aren't suppressing it. They have critiqued it and revealed that it is full of flawed methodology, impossible conclusions and absurd physics.

"Velikovsky's ideas have been rejected by mainstream academia (often vociferously so) and his work is generally regarded as erroneous in all its detailed conclusions. Moreover, scholars view his unorthodox methodology (for example, using comparative mythology to derive scenarios in celestial mechanics) as an unacceptable way to arrive at conclusions."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

 

Define define

 

Ouch @Hoddle Is A God

 

The Electric Universe Model looks at things differently, in terms of electrical attraction.

It does not deny the effect of gravity. It merely explains it in electrical terms.

If you are genuinely interested in exploring this subject, start watching the many Thunderbolts Project videos on YouTube.

They are very informative and founded on genuine science.

 

Genuine science that is only available on YouTube. A theory for which there is no supporting evidence and cannot be modelled or reproduced by modern science.

I'm supposed to take this seriously when stacked against a simple model that is used repeatably every time the effects of gravity are measured.

 

If you think this crackpot model of gravity is fun, you're in for a treat. Here are some of their other claims:

• Einstein's postulates are wrong.[8]
• General relativity (GR) is wrong.[9]
• The Universe is not expanding.[10]
• The electric force travels faster than the speed of light with near-infinite velocity.[8]
• Gravity has two poles like a bar magnet; dipole gravity.[11]
• A plenum of neutrinos forms an all-pervasive aether.[8]
• Planets give birth to comets.[12]
• Stars do not shine because of internal nuclear fusion caused by gravitational collapse. Rather, they are anodes for galactic discharge currents.[13]
• Impact craters on Venus, Mars and the Moon are not caused by impacts, but by electrical discharges.[14] The same applies to the Valles Marineris (a massive canyon on Mars) and the Grand Canyon on Earth.[15]
• The Sun is negatively charged, and the solar wind is positively charged — the two systems forming a giant capacitor (this is James McCanney's particular erroneous belief.)[16]
• EU proponents from the Thunderbolts Project claim to have predicted the natures of Pluto and Comet 67P more accurately than NASA or ESA.[17][18]
• The sun is a space lamp getting power from something somewhere, we've never observed this stream of electricity nor any of these power sources that are on the center of each galaxy powering every star in them.
• That things like comets are electric, we've never observed such a thing as an electric comet.
• That craters are scars left from space thunderstorms, we've never observed such a phenomenon. It also claims that things like meteors are not what causes them despite the fact that we literally have video footage of meteor impacts.
• That gravity is electromagnetic in nature which implies that it can be repulsive too, yet it has failed to demonstrate antigravity.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Electric_Universe