Here you go mate. It was on the Tottenham hotspur spiral watch thread https://www.not606.com/threads/the-tottenham-hotspur-spiral-watch.335992/page-303#post-11991186
HIAGs confusion with this bet is that he mistakenly thought the terms were agreed, when in fact G4E was still negotiating. When G4E laid out the final terms of the bet and asked HIAG if he agreed, he did, as proven in the link above. HIAG has then subsequently realised he ****ed up because he lost the bet and is now trying to welch once again. We even had a real lawyer run the rule over this one to clear up any misunderstanding and he agreed that HIAG has lost the bet and should now change his avatar to one of G4E’s choice.
Oh well, while G4E and HIAG have it out, this is my final day of being reminded of our CL Final loss with this **** of an avatar, I’ll be finally able to move on!
You have been caught with your trousers down there mate.. Take it like a man and hop in to G4E's net.. .. win some, lose some
@Hoddle Is A God king joe has spoken mate. You tried your best but the evidence has spoken for itself
This is yet another case of HIAG trying to welch on a bet he's lost because he's claiming he didn't understand the terms. He still owes Fosse his avatar with a similar bet that he welched on claiming he didn't understand the terms, despite having agreed to them. Reckon @brb might have to change it and lock it in if HIAG doesn't do the honourable thing and abide by his bets.
Trouble is, you keep quoting the claim made by him after he had accepted the actual bet. That quote is G4E trying to squirm out of it. I’m waiting for someone to link to the conversation that a few of us had on this subject. I remember quite a few (people not known for supporting me) who agreed that G4E lost. It really does you no favours to aid and abet a welcher.