Jail/prison

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Bird for refusing a breath test?

That's ridiculous!

It will be quashed on appeal, as I cannot imagine that there are any aggravating factors to justify a custodial sentence. The driving ban is sufficient.
 
Hoddle Is A God said:
Bird for refusing a breath test?

That's ridiculous!

It will be quashed on appeal, as I cannot imagine that there are any aggravating factors to justify a custodial sentence. The driving ban is sufficient.
Click to expand...

Think he nearly took a couple of cars out mate and refused the breath test citing mitigation. Rumour has it he then went on and on about his playing days for Wales, so yeah aggravating factors galore..:) I'm sure if they scan his brain, they would find the perfect Shepherds Pie..<ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman
J๏E.. said:
Yeah I read that earlier, watch him appeal it and get 20 weeks instead <laugh>
Click to expand...
That would be funny as **** tbh <laugh>

I wonder if he'll be sent to some cat D open prison or banged up in wanno with the gutter rats.
 
J๏E.. said:
Think he nearly took a couple of cars out mate and refused the breath test citing mitigation. Rumour has it he then went on and on about his playing days for Wales, so yeah aggravating factors galore..:) I'm sure if they scan his brain, they would find the perfect Shepherds Pie..<ok>
Click to expand...


Ah! Now it all falls into place!

Thanks, Joe.
<ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: J๏E..
Hoddle Is A God said:
Bird for refusing a breath test?

That's ridiculous!

It will be quashed on appeal, as I cannot imagine that there are any aggravating factors to justify a custodial sentence. The driving ban is sufficient.
Click to expand...

And that's why people drink drive...cos they only get a ban at worse.

Suppose he hit another car or pedestrian and hurt or killed them...a ban would not have been ok then would it? It is only luck that meant this did not happen.

No sympathay ... the bloke admitted to drinking and says it reacted with the pain killers he takes... everyone knows that alcohol and painkillers do not mix.
To drive in that state makes him a **** imho cos he could afford a ****ing chauffeur let alone a cab.

He is lucky he did not seriously hurt or kill someone.

This isn't the 1970s...EVERYONE knows the dangers of drink driving so there is no excuse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyBobBallbag, JakartaToon, ValleyGraduate12 and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back