I've got copies of emails from Ron Black (OSC), Andy Dalton (AN), Geoff Bielby (HCST) and myself, all saying that the membership scheme should not proceed as proposed and all complaining that we were promised another meeting with the final version before it was released, but it was released without any further discussion. Your assertion is completely inaccurate.
I can't imagine what would make you want to be so sycophantic as to not only go to such trouble to defend the actions of the Allams on this issue, but also to get so enraged as this when someone calls you out on the inaccuracy of it. For what it's worth, no one asked for your view on it because they were subject to an NDA by the club. No matter how desperately you want it to be the fault of the fans, it really isn't.
Yeah you've been saying for years that you're not defending the Allams or their schemes. While defending them.
823 (and countng) pages of unsubstantiated rumour and repetitive abuse.Sad. Someone like Phil Upper West attempts a bit of balance or realism amid the bullshit, and gets howled down. It's almost like some people enjoy feeling victimised or need to find a reason why they don't attend games.
Here's what was said on this forum at the time the membership scheme was introduced. https://www.not606.com/threads/new-membership-scheme-thirtys-plenty.324945/page-15
It seems the annual "Bengals Tiger Award for (...insert whatever is appropriate)" has a short list of contenders this season. Civility rules "Mirror mirror, on the wall."
Did you find anything from the working group in the February with the NDA attached? I looked but couldn't find it.
How many people have abused the system this season by moving from cheaper seats. 3 of us did it at halftime at bristol game.
Has it ever, just once, occurred to you that you might be wrong and that other people see things differently ? Or that your 20 years at the KC in the corporate seats doesn't entitle you to be judge and jury over everyone else ?
I’m judge and jury over nothing, but someone who was at a meeting quite obviously knows more about what happened at it, than someone who wasn’t.
