Membership scheme vote - Concessions to return...

Your house would probably have been safer leaving your pass in the house Dennis

 

I haven't seen any reference to the Upper West Stand anywhere. Do we know what the HCST are referring to here? What do they mean by maintenance work as well?

 

Match card holder can vote

 

Maintenance...

The toilets should smell so bad you spend the rest of your life in therapy.

When the ball is hoofed by your teams best striker and lands on the roof, you should be showered in rust.

The stands you stand in should be crumbling away and very dangerous.

The pies must be months out of date and be at least five quid a pop, if available at all.

The beer should be warm and not taste of beer. Never under any circumstances should the pipes be cleaned.

The pitch should be the envy of the footballing world.

Etc...

 

Is the North stand not available next season?

 

Depends
Option A yes
Option B no

 

Depends on what you vote for , for some reason having concessions means we have to go back to having away fans in the North stand

 

sounds very much like 'fer ark' that many on here long for, only it couldn't be because you couldn't get a beer, warm or otherwise at BP.

 

I had a quick glance at the options when it was first published and thought I must have made a mistake. They are bigger ****s than I thought they were. And I did think they were 'ginormous' ****s before this offering.

 

You could if Dave Dewberry had his specially adapted overcoat on in middle of Bunkers.

 

According to Ehab Option B is on the ballot because it existed before they took over and isn't an option that has anything to do with the family.

If he is serious about finding an acceptable alternative I don't understand why they haven't sat down with the various supporters groups (including the Trust) and tried to come up with an alternative that could have been supported by all of them. It can't have been that difficult. Option B with a few sensible tweaks would have had the support of large numbers of City fans.

 

You do understand why he hasn’t down with supporters groups really though don’t you...

I agree though
Option B
Leave North Stand for home fans
Include disabled supporters in concessions
Done deal

 

Yes and part of it is understandable, but if he really wants to turn around the mess we are in then he's got to talk to the Trust. As you've shown a solution acceptable to the vast majority of City supporters is fairly straightforward. There may be a few tweaks needed but that's what the meeting(s) could iron out.

If he just wants to drive through Option A then he doesn't have to talk to anyone.

 

What's wrong with that? Everyone kicked off like **** when we were moved from the east originally. A move back to the east and return of concessions would be a massive step forward.

 

Bollocks
If any of us want to move back there’s plenty of seats
Concessions - Yes
Deliberately ****ing fans about again, just for a laugh for Ehab - No

 

It's clearly your fault Dennis, you're the common denominator in all of this musical chairs lark. I reckon you kept quiet about your spell in upper west to try to throw us of the scent.

Is there something you want to come clean about?

 

Plenty of seats at unaffordable prices under the current model, I personally welcome a return to how to used to be. The vision of a north stand 'kop' has been a complete failure.

 

The view from Upper West though
Amazing...

 

I thought Ehab had

You recently publicly stated that football administrators have now realised traditional pricing structures are wrong and so are interested in adopting your structure (or words to that effect). Why ballot now?

 

Erm
Is it because he’s a ****?


Go on... ask me another