I'd just like to say for the record what my position is regarding my future posts here on the subject of ITTV and its members. (the following has been my view for about the last six months or so, since shortly before I began posting again on that forum) For a while after I left ITTV of my own accord in the summer of 2017 I did post a number of messages on this thread which were critical of that forum and some of its members, and sometimes were mocking / sarcastic / generally unkind. I was posting as if I had been banned from there (which was not the case, I left of my own accord) and as if I could not express my views on that forum itself - which was also not the case; I could have gone back at any time. After a while I recognised that it was not right for me to behave in that manner. I am not criticising anything that any other not606 member has posted here, I am only speaking about some of my own posts during that period (mostly the second half of 2017). I was saying things on this thread which, if I needed to say them at all, I should have gone back to that forum and said directly. Since I stopped posting messages of that kind, I have tried in this thread and on this forum, to post only observations about ITTV which I would be comfortable to post on that forum as well... 'Neutral' observations if you will. I have done my best not to say anything which might be regarded by any ITTV member as a remote attack on them or their forum. Obviously it is only right for me (as somebody who has never been banned from that forum) to post anything critical about it on that forum itself rather than only say it here. I will try to keep any future posts I make about ITTV on this forum as objective as I can. To be clear; I'm not asking or expecting anybody else to refrain from posting whatever they wish on the subject of ITTV and its members. Naturally I have no right to do that and let me repeat that everything I have just written in this post applies solely to me. I just thought it might be a good time to explain why any of my future messages on this thread will take the form that they do.
To be fair to Reams, he gave it a go. Webbo, Garry Nelson, Nildo, Zohak, Disco & Willet are good posters on there. Reams claims that ITTV is an anti-Duchatelet site now, but the evidence of the last few weeks suggests otherwise. The Apologists juat want to post with their own type - a creepy fantasy world where the stadium is full, the team is brilliant and Duchatelet is a popular owner. The problem on ITTV is that you have a combination of freaks (BB and PL54), someone who has admitted to being a WUM - SR - and the three long time Apologists, who have so much invested in Duchatelet and Meire that they cannot now admit that they called it wrong. Jeddez Jonkool Canterbury Addick I actually find their crawling and admiration- for Meire in particular -a bit creepy. As for “bullying” - did you hear any of the muppets complain when Webbo gets hounded by Major every time he tries to post. Elfs and I will go back to posting on here. Just seen the comments of other 606ers on ITTV - thanks to @lardiman and @ken shabby for your support.
You must of had a nice early bath together …. I bet @Clb74 is relieved that it wasn't you and him in the bath
To be fair, my time on there wasn’t wasted. I nailed Jeddez with a simple question - has Duchatelet’s ownership of Charlton been good or bad. A No Brainer His reply ....”it’s complicated”
Nothing good will ever come from American rubbish like Coors , the rules for good gold are stick to German and Eastern Europe, the purity laws are there to protect us from filth like Coors blue moon
Sorry to be an old git, but some of the best beer in the world is brewed in the UK. Harveys bitter, Whitstable, Greenwich meantime and Punk IPA. Why go to bloody Prague when there is excellent beer on your doorstep? (And that from a man in eslf imposed exile in Barcelona )
Elfs & I cannot read ITTV anymore, but I understand the lack of support we have had from certain people who we have supported in the past, is amazing.
