.

J.K. Rowling announces a new Harry Potter book written to replace the Goblet of Fire, because that book was crap, Harry Potter and the Philosopher Stoned.

Harry Potter knew his new philosophy teacher was a fraud the moment he first gave him magic mushrooms, but he started an unlikely friendship with the marathon running man. Read this exciting new entry; join Harry on a drug fueled romp through Hogwarts, Hermoine as she takes so much acid she thinks the philosopher is a rock god, and Ron, Ron isn't in this book because no one likes that ginger bastard.


The New York Times- 4 stars.
J.K. Rowling? More like J.K. Rolling.

The Guardian- 1 star.
Rowling has lost the plot. This book is trash.

@DUNCAN DONUTS - 1 star
I hate this book... too many mud-bloods.

@Hoddle Is A God - 5 stars
Something about this book seems familiar.

The Daily Mail- 3 stars.
A rollicking tale where the snitch turns out to be a narc officer.

@Matth_2014 - 2 stars
I don't think this is a real book.

@Red Hadron Collider - 5 stars
I'm just glad someone else got photoshopped onto the cover.

Washington Post - 3 stars
Too many Harry Pot-'er jokes.

The Enquirer - 4 stars
Go Team Huff-and-puff

The Mirror- 4 stars
I didn't know whether to laugh, or to cry, so I read this book instead.

 

Is that really Hiag in the hat?

 

That is what I am told- and it does match the photos of the "band look" thread that Hiag himself posted, so I believe so.

 

`
You just got yourself a ban

 

Picture removed.

 

It's still up but small.

 

Thanks ...took me a few minutes to work out how to get rid of the thumbnail image too

 

yeah, lol, and now it become more visibledue to the ban.

 

I bet that's not the first time you've had to say that.

 

The first rule of posting other people's photos club is , would you be comfortable having your pictures put up ?

Stan is sending photos behind pm in a cowardly ****y little cyber Bullying gang attempt for some bizzare reason but petrified of having his own identify revealed.
Me and Saxton clearly don't care , of course the same pricks will call brb a Nazi for removing the pic and banning the milk guy but did he expect Hiag to see the funny side ?

 

Also it was a photoshop of the exact same picture that caused me loads of shhite last time. Unlucky for Milk I was clearing up some background admin stuff at the time, when i came across it.

 

There was no need to delete the thread about his ban

 

If you want to comment on it do it here.

 

why, I wanted a thread about it, deleting it was unnecessary.

 

Maybe you did but sadly you will have difficulty creating anymore, however, if you wish to pursue this argument please carry on

 

And what happens? I get a ban for posting an inane, fairly unoffensive thread about something that happened on the board? Why? Because you have a dairy intolerance?

 

It's nearly 1am in the fooking morning how about you give it a rest, rather than me having to piss about this time of the morning clearing users images off 606.

But yeah as you happen to mention it, at this time of the morning i have got an intolerance.

 

I didn't post any pictures in either thread, as you well know.
And Hiag has posted pictures of himself on the forum post photo-gate anyway, so he has put them in the Not606 domain himself

 

fair enough.

Completely hypocritical, but fair enough.

Bye everyone.

P.s. you may want to delete this temporary account I set up recently too, when I lost my password.

 

In hindsight maybe “Two finger Jack” would have been more to the point.

Ps. Law suit in the post.