Tips / Bets **Should HIAG honour his avatar bets ?**

Yeah he’ll still welch it. Just needs to be made clear that I didn’t ‘make it all up’ as he’s claiming.

He welched my bet and he’s welched fosse’s

#welcher

 

@Hoddle Is A God - Honour your bet, please. It's been proved without doubt that you've gone back on it.

This board has a code as far as I'm concerned, you've gone against that and let down everybody who has backed you up. It's never to late to gain respect back, just do the right thing

Edit: I change my no vote to a yes vote.

 

I’ve allowed people to change their votes. As some might want to review their decision in the face of this evidence.

 

Fred West Banter. Can @brb put that as Ginger's title, it sums him up nicely.

 

Changed my vote due to damning new evidence brought forward by the prosecution.
Shameful

 

Spot on and therefore not ambiguous. The bet was to go for 4 years - Leicester have to survive for 4 years before the bet is lost. Only someone with an agenda would see it otherwise.

 

Verdicts are only allowed where there is a fair trial.

 

Any reason you've done it as a screen print and not a link? I mean, I know you wouldn't amend it to change the meaning but.....actually I don't know that.

 

Wrong.

I agreed to the bet that you summarised.

If Bambi is not offering that bet, then there clearly is no bet.

I do not want to substitute the bet with any other bet.

If Bambi lacks the stones to go with the bet that you summarised, then the bet is void.

It’s a shame that he lacks confidence in his club to the extent that he believes they will be relegated within 4 seasons.

 

This entire incident has exposed the true and horrifying extent of Pixie’s obsession with me.

 

That is because being spuds they share the same persecution.

 

I’m engaging in harmless banter, Bodi.

Not quite sure why that rattled you so much?

 

But he is.....

So did Fosse, thats what the thread is about

No one asked you to, just to stick to the bet you both agreed on

I remember when the exchange took place, and iirc I also backed you on that occasion because it seemed clear to me that you had misunderstood the terms of the bet.
Fosse was saying that for 4 years, every time Leicester are NOT relegated, you have to change your avatar for a month, each time they stay up, BUT if they go down within those 4 years, Fosse changes his avatar for a whole year.
I thought that you didnt understand that he was saying you change your avatar every season they dont go down (so 4 times, provided they stay up in all those years), and you agreed on the bet not knowing that (though that is clearly what he said).

But Piskies post shows you DID understand the terms of the bet and were just welching.

 

Be careful Fred doesn’t come for you.

 

Seems the lads have spoken and when Saffy changes his vote it will read 17 for and just 7 against but would have been more damning without one political abstainee and a sycophantic Spud.

All down to @brb now...

 

Or someone with their tongue up the accuseds arse who can’t see past the ballsack.

 

I believe the board jury has spoken............

 

Do you really think that HIAG accepted that bet? Look at the screen dump. The first line is the giveaway, it is utterly sarcastic. One thing we know about HIAG is that he won't let Piskie summarise **** on his behalf. Also why is Piskie not giving a link to the original exchange. I suspect he knows it will look very different to how he is presenting it here. Don't have to be Perry Mason to get HIAG cleared of this one. Apart from anything, HIAG is hard to tie down on a bet, but he is suddenly going to agree to a stupid bet that means he loses his avatar potentially 4 times. Never.

The board jury isn't impartial and so cannot convict.

 

‘You don’t have to be Perry Mason’.

So why are you trying?