I’m not a victim. But you are a troll. I know I’m entitled to post here. It’s not your forum, and I don’t need your permission. I’m waiting for an apology from you.
Part 2: On May 28th I was told that it was lock stock and barrel. Nothing I’ve heard since has contradicted that.
An ex director with an axe to grind. But it's third hand info. Maybe it's true, but if it was, why would the Aussies deny it, when it will, obviously be shown to be true soon enough?
Who would have thought that the loan or non-loan of a statue would be critical to the success of the Charlton takeover