This time last year the Dortmund team coach was bombed. I'm sure brb was all over it .................... not
I've always felt that the people with the power to ban other users shouldn't take part on the forum themselves. It never worked for the Eaves woman or ja606. Every time an argument broke out, those with the power stopped it by eliminating the competition - that's dictatorship.
A Spud fan on their "mouser thread" "Spur of the MomentWell-Known Member Start a Conversation Joined: Jun 14, 2011 Messages: 7,594 Likes Received: 3,963 New I’m sure that in the ‘apologies’ that emanated from Mouserland last night regarding the attack on the Citeh coach, there was a general ‘4 or 5 thugs don’t represent the clubs fans’ message. The footage from inside the coach shows a rather different story - a concerted assault on the bus over a few hundred yards, with flares, coins and bottles (and maybe even the occasional piss-sock) thrown at the bus. Manchester City team bus attack: Manuel Estiarte films from inside coach arriving at Anfield http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43651014 This is all quite disgraceful - and with the flare issues during the game you would logically expect a very heavy book to be the next thing thrown in Liverpool. However, we all know that all this will mysteriously disappear off the front and back pages." A jealousy filled diatribe slating us all, he's obviously still in mourning for the Juve defeat, was going to ask him his opinion on the young 17 year old girl who was shot and murdered in Tottenham last week but thought better of it than stooping to the ****bag's level. He needs only read our comments about the attack on the bus to know it was a shameful incident, that none of us condone it and that we hope those involved in the throwing of objects etc are caught, named and shamed. But ****s like most of those on the Spurs board already have preordained opinions of us.
Well, I was wrong about whether Uefa would get involved due to the incident happening on a public road, the results of their inquiry into what punishment LFC get will be published 5 days after the CL final. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43652335 Whilst I accept that our will be punished for what the idiotic rats did I still find it strange that Uefa haven't punished clubs In the past for much worse incidents like those I highlighted in my previous comment. Wouldn't surprise me if we have to play a couple of closed doors games next season, or a worse scenario that we get a season long ban(after all LFC unfortunately do have a lot of previous), but let's wait and see.
Don't forget David Gill is on the Uefa exec committee and Woodward is on the Uefa strategy council, we're ****ed.
UEFA have a lot of previous for false allegations e.g. Sakho ban for legal substance and LFC charged for "Manchester is full of ****" in the same game that "Murderers" banner and chants were ignored
After all is said and done the club has a responsibility for fan behaviour. Fans know this so should act in a manner that doesn't reflect badly on the club. Some choose to ignore this which results in us all being tarred with the same brush. I really wish this lunatic element would stay at home.
What are LFC practically expected to do? Nothing happened to Chelsea for their fans in their shirts being convicted of violent racism in Paris so how can LFC be punished for anyone in L4 lashing a bottle on match day?
That's like trying to answer how long is a piece of string. The club put this out before the game “We ask that any supporters who do wish to gather to show their passion and support for the team, do so in a friendly, respectful and considerate manner.” They can only ask. It's different to bad behaviour in the stadium and it's hard to see how any club or governing body can step in and make a ruling on private citizens on a public road but they were still 'representing' the club like it or not.
My daughter asked me to read through her dissertation to check it reads ok. What the f*ck do I know about "The Role of TRPM2 Channels in Alzheimers Disease". Well I will pour myself a port and give it a go!
TRPM2 is a protein encoded by this gene and is a non-selective calcium-permeable cation channel and is part of the Transient Receptor Potential ion channel super family. In the brain it is involved in the toxicity of amyloid beta, a protein associated with Alzheimer's disease. Hope that helps
That is the basics, her dissertation goes a lot further. I would put a sample up on the forum for you, but as part of it will be incorporated into a paper one of her Professors is publishing she has banned me from doing so
