Monday's Meeting 26/02/18.

Vb defo

 

Yep, playing for time as they reclaim the "gift".

 

What is the point in BW being there? Brings up the most irrelevant things and this time, she’s conplaining about the South Stand being upset with the North Stand - a statement she cannot conclusively back up.

 

David Beeby, the posstot that closed down the Scunthorpe United OWS message board, claiming "it served no useful purpose", aka their regime didn't like criticism.


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.

 

So
GB is doing a good job as the only one representing me (because my Stand has no rep)
However this still looks dragged out **** to me
Can’t change brand use before the Villa game? Bollocks
Can’t change the badge in time for next season?!?! Double bollocks

And have I read that the people on the committee get to vote on concessions...or is it every season pass holder?

Not saying GB should be kicking off, he’s in an unenviable position

It sounds like Vicky Beercock is a positive influence to me. I’m sure she believes she has the autonomy to deliver what’s needed, and I hope she’s right. TWT of course

BUT continue protests...are the balls out tonight?

 

Load of bollocks time wasting.

 

I was very sorry to hear that the Allams and some fans in the south stand were upset by the protests in the north stand though

 

Season members but it's strangely worded as you'd expect.

The Club will conduct a democratic process on this, with a vote taking place next week (week commencing: 5th March 2018) for Members to have their say in relation to how they want the Club to go forward with concessionary pricing. With the view for the decision to come into force as soon as possible.

KT queried what the question would be for this vote, is it a simple yes/no vote on the concessionary pricing offered by the Club late last year?

DB stated that the question has not been finalised however the question will be offering a differing pricing structure or keeping the current ticketing scheme.

KT queries if a change in ticketing policy would occur this season or would this be looking to change in the 2018/2019 campaign.

DB answered that the Club would be looking to implement the policy (if agreed to by supporters) for the Norwich City game however this has not been finalised. This would not affect anyone on the Membership scheme as the Club hasn’t decided on how and when a pricing structure would occur in relation to Members.

GB offered a solution to offering a concession price to Members by suggesting that the Club could stop taking direct debit payments from concessionary supporters who would have already paid enough throughout this current season.

DB queried on how logistically this could be done however stated that the Club would look at this if they think of bringing a different pricing structure into the Membership scheme. VB follows on from this stating that the Club will go away and work on what is possible in relation to this and come back to the Committee on what they would recommend.

 

Cheers (I’d read it as Committee Members)

If Members are wrong then the balls have it !

 

So exactly what ****ing progress has been made?
Next to **** all, that's what.
And the petty childish vindictive stubborn ****s couldn't even be bothered to attend (yeah, a big '**** you representatives' ..... again).
So they've said they'll use 'Hull City' on social media platforms. They already do now and then. Evasive and no commitment to using the names that we want and as we want them used.
Then more delay and waiting for PROCESSES, not for the actual changes.And now delayed so long that a new badge can't be used on shirts for another year and a half.
We don't ****ing want a new crest or new names. We surely just want to go back to how it was before the ****s spitefully changed what we had. And that is simply what 'our representatives' (ha ****ing ha) should insist on. Reverting back to our proper names and crest takes 1 minute, at least where they can immediately be used, which is a lot of places.
And as for the comments from some of 'our representatives'! They can **** right off.
When I read the earlier headline about the talks being constructive, pivotal moment, etc I thought great, about time. Having read the minutes I am even more angry than before.

 

This is the Allams.

It's a marathon not a sprint ladies.

Keep up the pressure

 

Calm down Driff. You'll do yourself some damage. I agree with your post.

 

We don't agree that often but I completely agree with this.

The success we have had so far has come from protests. We need to keep them protests coming as this will put even more pressure on them.

I still wish someone would tell them that from a business point of view by not having concessions they are losing a lot of money. I went to BP on a £2 ticket and had twenty odd years of a season ticket, I reckon it was worth them giving me that cheap ticket!

 

Literally zero progress has been made here.

 

Your point about concessions attracting life time supporters is spot on but they were never in it for the long term so don't give a ****.

 

One he's put himself in. VB seems to have been instrumental in this strategy and her inclusion hasn't been a knee-jerk reaction. She's a part of the game, a new dealer of the cards. Beerdick seems a great accompaniment to Poker...

...will she twist or Brag about it; a bit of Patience is needed, maybe.

 

And those concessions who have stopped going, don't get a say in the changes.

 

Part of why I get so wound up is because what the majority of fans want (if we can still count as fans the thousands that have just walked away from it) is so bleedin simple, yet the Allams are deliberately making it complicated and adding delay after delay. And many are falling for it time and again.
As someone else posted recently (Charon?), the message back should be simple. Stop ****ing us about and simply change the name and the badge back to how it was IMMEDIATELY on everything that is possible, and on everything else as soon as realistic. There doesn't need to be any process, any consultation, any further discussions and considerations on those topics.
Concessions is a little different, but even then after x months already passed, and proposals given, they should be acting now, not talking of starting a process or whatever, so the 'reps' (ha ha) should be demanding ACTION, not more words, delay, etc.

 

My response was rather nasty Mr Hatem. I do apologise.