It's not brilliant. Now the protest gangs will be fornicating about an evening of whistle blowing but only a handful of people will bring whistles, of those most will get confiscated, and nothing worthwhile will go ahead. Maybe brilliant for you Ass lovers, who just want to watch good football at the expense of children. Or principles. Or anything that doesn't directly benefit your selfish agendas. Just wait til he takes your ball home too.
There are two separate protest groups? (sort of working together) and one has a militant wing which operates under the name Hull City Protesters? What is the name of the one that does not have a militant wing? What is the name of the one that does? Feel free to not reply if that would mean breaking a non disclosure agreement, or heaven forbid going back on your word.
I'm confused by all of this tbh. Are Hull City A.F.C. Protesters and Hull City Action For Change one and the same or totally separate?
It’s all getting rather silly as highlighted by this. Next we’ll be having “continuity”, “provisional” and “real” cropping up. Very silly and rather amateurish. MoH
I don't think the Hull City Supporters Trust have covered themselves in glory over this, "very silly and rather amateurish" is starting to look like a rather generous assessment of their input.
wouldn't surprise me if Rehab delayed selling tickets for the Blunts until after Mondays meeting - he'll claim more progress so there is no need for the protests - if the protests aren't called off by the Trust at Mondays meeting then he'll refuse to sell tickets and blame the Trust - we should insist on full resolution of branding and concessions at Mondays meeting - it wont matter to Rehab that the Trust don't represent all the different fan factions, they will be painted as the group that is causing unnecessary unrest - may not happen but hopefully the trust have got a strategy for dealing with this outcome
**** me Bobsta. I'm Anti Allam now. Have been for ages. I've personally sacrificed going to see my beloved City since the introduction of the ****ty membership scheme. Despite it personally benefiting me. Apart from that 1 time my daughters got me 2 tickets for the Reading game, so me and PLT went together, brothers in arms, and I joined the Trust. If I wasn't boycotting, I'd be there with a ****ing huge whistle waving an Allams Out banner. I don't have a ball either, not that I'd give it up if I did. #Allamsout
You've lost me here, possibly a whoosh, I dunno. How can the Trust call off something it's got **** all to do with? I've been whooshed haven't I?
The Chairman of the Trust said and it was in the HDM that supporters were getting pissed off at the lack of action and change of tack by the Allams despite two meetings with supporters last year, he was hoping something constructive would come out of the third meeting. The Allams took this as a thinly veiled threat of more protests and as a consequence cancelled that meeting. I would say it is the actions and/or lack of actions by the Allams that have increased the chance of more protests.
Point taken, but the gifts offered at meeting two are looking less and less appropriate as the confusion over who is representing who increases.
No you've not. In another masterstroke the Allams have put all responsibility for all and any protests onto the Trust, even though we know the trust have not called for protests and any that happen will be done by other groups or individuals.
