For those who still don't quite get it, “We are still very much committed to continuing with open dialogue" is called delaying tactics. Does anyone seriously expect concessions or anything else to be implemented before the end of the season? Remember, the owners are selling up in the next few months so why should they bother sorting this mess out for someone else? Before you ask, yes they are leaving. We know this for a fact because they are men of their word and when they say something they mean it.
The Allam virus infesting Hull City never had any intentions to backing down or offering a compromise.. There word is final and they will do what the **** they want. I don't believe loads sneaked in on a kids pass or a pensioners pass in the first place I don't believe a word they say. Things will never improve while the Allams are at the club . Tell them to shove any future meetings up there arses.. There's lots of things people would LOVE TO DO but we can't do anything illegal Don't bother going anymore till the Allams have gone is the only thing I can think of.
X If Ehab is reading this, Chaz was only JOKING . Chaz would NEVER harm anyone. I reckon Ehab spies on this site Chaz. Or has a spy on here reporting what people say.
I said it all along, the request for an amnesty was purely to deflect the possibility of a protest when the Queen came on their big day. Once that passed they have, and will continue to do, find every excuse they can to do nothing, as was their intention from the beginning. Waste of time talking to these cretins, they are liars, and will twist everything they can to their favour.
it seems that there's only much chance of making money from buying and selling a club but not from running it.
This is more to the point and why the dialogue was always less than pointless, it was a damaging distraction. It was a scarf, article, weather, flat tyre, or peanut allergy; well two of those, the obviously preventable two. Somebody started to enjoy the limelight, maybe...
Wasn't the whole point of the dialogue to reshape those fully formed thoughts? Although I agree with you, as it was fundamental to my reasoning that dialogue was pointless and demeaning... ...hey presto.
Because this is what they are and how they behave. It was predictable ( in some form or other) and only disappointing that they used two seemingly preventable excuses.
Over the years we have all learnt how the Allams operate, some of us earlier some later. One would have thought those going to meet the Allams would be fully aware of their devious tricks so giving them not one but two reasons to play their childish games can be seen as very very naive. Some one said on here about giving the Allams enough rope well that can be said for both sides.
At the next meeting the reps should turn up and cancel it straight away. Stupid to do the scarf thing? Have we all lost our minds? They are a cancer at this club. They're lucky they can drive about this city without getting serious abuse and some of our flowers are concerned a scarf gives the Allams the moral high ground? A scarf?! **** me.
a bit of a **** up really - 1 we ended up with all the actions from the meetings when they needed to change things 2 the scarf thing was a ridiculous thing to do in the circumstances 3 cant understand why we went to the press before the meeting - after maybe but at least make sure it was three meetings with no action easy to be wise after the event but all these were very foreseeable - the Allams asked for these meetings in return for an amnesty - we held all the cards - we've just handed them the cards in return for nothing - we could have procured change or make them look like a pair of ****s, we've made ourselves look the villains now - as I said - **** up
Why are they lucky? I am no Allam apologist but anyone who was to do that would most likely commit criminal offences. Indeed, some of things posted on this very forum would be of interest to the authorities. Meanwhile, at a much lower level there is censorship being used by those like you (judged by the vective in your most recent post) to stifle genuine debate amongst the members of this forum. It appears that anyone who tries to apply logic, setting aside emotion, is a “flower” or some other derogatory term. Hardly conducive to dialogue amongst the supporters is it? And yet we expect the Allams to accept such sentiments? Double standards and we, as fans of this club, should know better than to advocate such an approach. MoH
Surprised at you Charon. They are supposed to be adults, not 3 year olds running to their Mam because someone stuck their tongue out at them. Anyone going on about the harmless scarf and the non-threatening article are simply fuelling the Allams excuse / latest delaying tactic and fuelling the apologists. Instead surely we should all be simply focussing on how once again they have shown themselves to be utter cretins in relation to our football club.
