No, I attract both female and male attention. Best of both worlds for me. I like cock and fanny quite often at the same time in fact
No, because there is a large overlap in the qualities that make someone pre-disposed to gayness and the qualities that actually make them a good parent/family unit. The ones on the gay extreme will probably be lost yes, but the ones who were borderline or could have been in a different social environment tend to be more family oriented and thus the mild genes spread. If you imagine it more accurately as a 0%-100% gay rate, those who hit 80% and above have a very high rate of actually being gay and hence not reproducing (not always the case now either with IVF), that still leaves a lot of people in the 50-80% range who can procreate and if those have different factors then you could easily end up with a kid higher than one or both parents. And the greater %age thing is a fallacy. That number has always and will always be influenced by societies expectations. In Pre-Christian Rome it was perfectly acceptable to have homosexual sex and a good percentage of people did, whether by choice or as part of the duty as a slave, I believe it was the same in Greece and Egypt during their civilisational golden ages as well. I'd be willing to be the percentage who admit to it today is far lower than back then, it's just higher than the recent past.
It must be a pre-disposition and a cause of the environment. Some families might have just one gay kid, but surely they were raised all the same (or very similar) way so something else may have caused it. Might just be that you are born gay. Certainly some people you'd never guess are gay, like that Welsh rugby player. I've got nothing against bumboys, certainly nothing against lesbians, but I do have a problem with people that say it's natural. Well surely if it was natural, one could concieve offspring via homosexuality. Certainly many species wouldn't last long if they were mostly gay. Anyhoo, each to their own.
It's complicated of course. By 7 we already have a lot of our full development done. The teasing could also have effected him, call someone something enough and they can believe it, subconsciously at least. Being in a very masculine environment could also have separated him out and made him want to feel part of something because he didn't fit in with that. And as I said, genetics is not black and white, a family of 5 kids can easily have 1 who is diabetic and 4 who are not or several with a certain allergy but not all.
Being in the same family is no guarantee of same upbringings, in fact the very fact of having brothers, sisters and what order and where you fit in that makes each one unique. Eldest siblings tend to be more dominant in nature, either by force or by protection, they also tend to feel more independent but also more bitter in having to do things for themselves whereas later kids have footsteps to follow in, which can in turn be a help or a hindrance and can be welcomed or resented. These relationships can often have a greater effect on someone's personality than any amount of conscious nurturing.
In the womb, it's the conversion of testosterone that results in the female sex determination if I remember correctly (somthing to do with the presence of an enzyme not found in males because of the genes lacking on the Y chromosome). Maybe a lack of testosterone can result in more effeminate males (which may result in a more sterotypical gay image) but there are plenty of homosexuals that don't strike you as being gay.
I agree with bits of this. But as (I think) someone mentioned before it's massively overly simplistic to think of a single 'gay' gene or deny the possibility that homosexuality has a genetic component. Sexuality, sexual preference etc etc is extremely complicated and likely to determined by multiple genetic factors ie you have to have the 'right' combination of genes. Or it could be a 'dosage' thing (like with testosterone, everyone has some, some people have more than others, and it has associated effects on behaviour). Or it could be a combination of multiple genes with environmental factors. As for the 'difficulties' of homosexuality being passed on by heterosexual parents - there are no difficulties whatsoever, it's a misunderstanding of basic genetics. It's perfectly possible for a bloke to be bald despite both parents having full heads of hair, or having blue eyes when both parents have brown eyes etc etc etc. And baldness and eye colour are undoubtedly both genetically determined.
my understanding is that this is the theory some are trying to push forward, but its not finding any substance the theory of mental illness is the most accurate at the moment, but this is not PC
Turd burglars like cock and carpet munchers like minge. That's all there is to it. Plain and simple. Doesn't make anyone a bad person at all. It's life so live it the way you feel is right for you. Hang on Robert darling................I'm just coming.
Actually it's the other way round. The SRY gene determines 'maleness' and is found on the Y chromosome.
I fear you may be right. You actually made me get out my endocrinolgy notes. The female condition is default, testosterone promotes development of the male sexual organs.
If it was genetic then in the modern liberal age we should see a decline in homosexuality within a generation, considering the vast majority of out homosexuals do not have children - and it's much easier to come out and not bring up a family for the sake of society's opinion these days. The straight people who have the dormant gene might pass it on to make their children gay, but those children will not pass the gene on... and so on. Homosexuality would therefore be a genetic dead end. At that stage the only people helping to keep the homosexuality gene active would be people who come from cultures where it is not acceptable to come out, in other words it would be immigrants, coming to our country, taking our jobs, shagging our men someone phone the Daily Mail.
maybe its coz women are getting easy, so no thrill/excitement in the chase thats why they reckon george michael is gay
Aye animals are much more exhilerating. It's the chase you see, the hunt. Well that and the fact there is no post coital conversation.
Not your mother is gay, but you get it from your mother. Like baldness, technically, it's your mother that give you it but she isn't bald. If she is then I'm sorry.
