Didn't stop Wiggins or Cavendish winning it not too long ago. Whilst I do think comparing different sporting achievements makes little sense and is a bit bollocks, Froome is probably the best choice.
Froome, all the way. Anything else is a disgrace after what he has achieved. Not to diminish others, but, he's the standout.
Is Wiggins the only cyclist in history who hasn't taken drugs? I'm pretty certain he just runs on the power of Paul Weller.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cycling/...g-agency-considers-ban-drug-used-sir-bradley/ old Wiggy takes them, they're just not illegal yet
Even as a child, I could never fathom why anyone was genuinely interested in watching or discussing this award.
I am glad to see the media has jumped to conclusions as always. Before judging someone lets wait until the full facts have been released and the governing body has put their case forward. I doubt he will win SPOTY now, but lets wait for all the evidence before claiming he is the next Lance Armstrong.