Match Day Thread Saints v West Ham - K.O. 3pm Saturday 19th August

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It is, but once again, your undertones come through - and I am not the only one to notice it. And by the way being PC isn't a crime. As I said before we are in 2017 now, so equality is here, for men, women, black, white, yellow, brown, gay and straight. Next you'll be saying that there are some good neo-nazis.

Enough now? Please.
 
I was trying to remember why West Ham were on my dislike list and realised it was down to when we were trying to gain promotion from the Championship and they were rivals at the top. As a matter of principle I want them to finish below us (together with Bournemouth and Brighton), but I have now promoted them to the neutral list. After some housekeeping, my dislike list is very short being basically Liverpool (the bastards). Everton are next (as long as Koeman is there because don't like seeing him being interviewed). United are there for old times sake. Spurs have shuffled down and are close to being a neutral team.
 
I can't see any of those teams in a similar position to Saints in trying to improve themselves as being on a "dislike" list although, for reasons I could never really appreciate other than their plastic pitch, Luton Town always used to be next after Portsmouth. I think that both these teams haven't been on our radar for years now. You always expect a match against West Ham to be entertaining - other than during Allardyce's tenure.Tony Pulis' teams are usually pretty dreadful but the lack of entertainment is insufficient reason to put them on a dislike list.
 
As labelling people and places seems to be taboo I have written the ultimate generic PC match report. There will no longer be a need to name players or places as this will offend the sensitive so the terms that physically describe someone by colour or gender must go and as place may imply some sort of hierarchy of value locations and places must not be mentioned. We must also not differentiate by gender so in future every match report will be "Some people from different places met and kicked a ball around for a while". Who scored the most goals is immaterial as this would imply failure and criticism. We shall no longer publish a league table as this might imply some people have greater worth. Finally we need to think again about the football itself as the skins of murdered animals are used in their manufacture. It has been suggested that a beach ball would be a suitable alternative. Finally cheering and chanting will be banned at games as this implies an unfair preference for a group of people or another and could cause distress and upset. There you have it. The way to a happy and contented world. Thankfully I will soon be dead.
 
https://southamptonfc.com/news/2017...-two-mauricio-pellegrino-southampton-west-ham

The written press section of Mauricio's press conference. Sorry if posted earlier. I liked his answer when he was asked about the problem of having 5 CBs if we sign a new player and Virgil is available. 'I would rather have a solution on the pitch than a problem.' No manager is going to complain about having too many players.
 
As labelling people and places seems to be taboo I have written the ultimate generic PC match report. There will no longer be a need to name players or places as this will offend the sensitive so the terms that physically describe someone by colour or gender must go and as place may imply some sort of hierarchy of value locations and places must not be mentioned. We must also not differentiate by gender so in future every match report will be "Some people from different places met and kicked a ball around for a while". Who scored the most goals is immaterial as this would imply failure and criticism. We shall no longer publish a league table as this might imply some people have greater worth. Finally we need to think again about the football itself as the skins of murdered animals are used in their manufacture. It has been suggested that a beach ball would be a suitable alternative. Finally cheering and chanting will be banned at games as this implies an unfair preference for a group of people or another and could cause distress and upset. There you have it. The way to a happy and contented world. Thankfully I will soon be dead.

Don't think they are anymore, Grandad. We're in the 21st Century now, or some of us are.
 
No problem. Just being a bit cynical. Don't know where Vin is coming from sometimes.

OK, here goes.

It wasn't a comment about anything other than the fact that you regularly referred to Claude Puel (whom you made clear you didn't like from the day he started) as "The Frenchman". You seem to have a low opinion of Sofiane Boufal, whom you call "The Algerian". The prejudice to which I was referring is your prejudice against people without reason that shows by the way you choose to refer to them. It's nothing at all to do with PC or not-PC, it's to do with writing about people as human beings and having an open rather than closed mind.

So, to clarify the clarification, I felt that your use of the words "The Algerian" after an excellent performance last game suggested you'd prejudged him in exactly the same way as you did "The Frenchman" last year: once that's happened, experience tells me you'll be on his back whatever he does for the rest of the year. Hence the word "prejudice".

Prejudice: an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason

Nothing at all to do with racism or nationalism (or Naziism, ffs)

Vin