Gonzo's Erection Thread

Might have been better if our underfunded services had followed these boys and stopped them before anyone died.

We'll find out if they were on a watch list or not. If they weren't then i apologise. If they are then obviously we lack the adequate resources.

 

Nope.. I made a simple statement that Corbyn is a terrorist loving bastard. This is true.

May continuing the error of every previous British govt with involving ourselves in the middle East is a separate but no less important issue.

You need to learn the definition of what aboutery..i made a true statement and you responded with "look a bear!" Because you are uncomfortable that my statement is in fact true...

List every error by every other politician in the world.. it doesn't change the fact that Cornyn is a terrorist loving bastard.

 

Every other politician in the world didn't directly contribute to the terror attacks by funding their creation as home secretary and their success by cutting security funding as PM, then ask to be given even more power

But is seems you've already found a lie you're prepared to believe in the name of justifying support for a dangerous, failed, and spitefully anti-UK citizen regime, so good luck with that

 

Your talking out your arse mate... my anti Tory stance has been clear and unequivocal on this thread..

What I refuse to do is adopt an anyone but approach to voting that forces me to gloss over concerns and short comings of a candidate simply because he's not a Tory.

The man is incompetent...had surrounded himself with incompetent people...has allowed thugs and anti Semites to do their worst in his name.

I believe him to every bit as dangerous to our society as the Tories if unleashed. He holds just as many unsavoury characters as the Tories as friends. They just use different letters and wave different flags.

I will vote "for" someone not against someone cheers all the same.

Only person lying is you mate to yourself..its why you're so aggressive in attacking those that see through the bullshit... they have to be aligned with the enemy otherwise your self delusion breaks down.

 

Article in The Independent which suggests the winners from Labour victory will be the top earning 105, mainly due to Labour's universal application of things like free child care, etc

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...rs-no-alternative-to-the-tories-a7770831.html

 

Corbyn has not been clear on his immigration policy which is a concern, May will do nothing. Corbyn will look to open a dialogue with these people. Is that right?
Is it time to open talks and try and sort this out through peaceful means?
May will come out with bluster and do very little, we'll tighten security for a while and nothing will happen for a bit and then we back to square one.
I'm not sure I'm comfortable with Corbyn looking to negotiate with these people, I'm also not happy with May doing **** all and people getting killed.

 

That shows the top 10% are massive losers under Labour, it's the middle classes who would benefit most, but even the poorest are far far better off than under the Tories

His poor argument is "Tories make the poorest people 10% poorer and Labour make them 7% poorer (but with better education, health care, and police) so they're just as bad"

He's just #desperate to split the "socialist" vote between Labour and Lib Dem to rescue the flailing Tories

 

Who are "these people" that he will negotiate with?

 

I think you should all ask why trump who promised to smash Isis within 100 days has done nothing.

 

Same reason he promised to repeal Obamacare in a month

 

Terrorists.

 

So when you have 100s of lunatic cells spread all over the country and working independently which ones do you talk to?

 

He will probably chat to them all individually over a cup of tea.

 

Theresa May will probably just chat to them over a glass of whiskey next time she's arming them.

 

Trump...promises to smash Isis...is in the Un hammering on about north Korea after prodding that senile old hound to see if it will bark...classic distraction tactic.

The only issues right now stopping a un coalition smashing Isis are

1. There nobody to agree in as successor to rule Syria and lybia after.

2. Nobody seems willing to be the Bush and Blair war mongers even though levelling Syria is now more than justified. Itseems to me people in power are so worried about another iraq they wont put troops anywhere.

We have armed kurds,russians bombing them.. us bombing whatever. France bombing whats left. None of it dealing with anything.

Lybia is Frances problem. They should deal with it.

Syria is obviously Russia's ally. So let Russia put troops in and smash the place flat.

Iraq is us problem.let them put troops in to meet the russians at the border.

Simplest.

None will do Jack.

 

There's always a leader or leaders they just don't advertise it now as they know what will happen. Anyway that's beside the point I'm unsure of what should happen next, the current strategy clearly isn't working, they are winning so what do we do now?

 

People like the IRA that Whitelaw and Thatcher negotiated with?

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-40153536

Corbyn calls May out on her hypocrisy of saying there needs to be "some difficult conversations" while simultaneously covering up a report that says her mates in Saudi Arabia are funding the terrorists

 

It's easy for any clown to call somebody out when they know they will never be in a position to actually act.

 

He thinks he has a shot, it's a long shot but May keeps narrowing the gap with her inability to actually do our say anything.