Who better to explain this situation than British muslim and CEO of Quilliam Haras Rafiq ...
You must log in or register to see media
Big Phil Campion ex SAS ...
You must log in or register to see media
Who better to explain this situation than British muslim and CEO of Quilliam Haras Rafiq ...
You must log in or register to see media
Big Phil Campion ex SAS ...
You must log in or register to see media
More whinging on Question Time from Muslims about feeling persecuted. Meanwhile the liberals clap along and give out the same ****ing platitudes about all pulling together and ensuring we don't upset the followers of this medieval faith.
A guy read out a leaflet given to him at Disbury mosque which was very anti Western culture etc. He was shut up very quickly when he tried to continue the debate.
Meanwhile we sit back and watch our children being slain.
I ****ing despair!
<snip>
I've just seen that Corbyn is focussing on British foreign policy in the middle-east as to why we're being attacked by Islamic terrorism. I don't buy it. Sweden have suffered terrorist attacks and they haven't bombed or invaded anyone as far as I'm aware.
Put the liberals on the next boat out after the Muslims by the look of it. But it's an unfair question Dipper and you know it. It's not Col's job to come up with a solution. He, like a lot of people including me, is angry, not just at the atrocity, but at the whole situation which has lead us to this state of affairs. From what I am reading he feels that our liberal values are at least partly to blame. In the case of Islam (or some forms of Islam, I can't be arsed to sub divide it) I think he may be right - it's such an isolating, all inclusive ideology (honestly, a religion which tells you how to dress and what to eat? And I know it's not the only one) that being open to it and making allowances for it may be a waste of time. But taking a defiantly illiberal approach to it, like in France (a proper secularist country), doesn't seem to help either. Today the police have said that ALL 3000 people they are trying to monitor have been brought to their attention by the Muslim community. I would like to compare this to France, how helpful is the community there (I don't know)?Col, I officially appoint you to be Prime Minister for the day.
What would you do to make us all safer and to stop the people promoting this from gaining further traction?
Col, you know where I stand on religion and especially religious violence (and for that matter any totalitarian ideology, religious or political, no matter how 'peace loving' they claim to be or even are. All are straitjackets for the mind).
,snip, snip, not too much off the top, please.
To be fair to Corbyn, (which can be difficult), I don't think he or anyone else is saying we were bad people for getting involved in the Middle East in recent years. It looked like the right thing to do for both us and them at the time to most people (some disagreed - I didn't). Hindsight has shown us it wasn't, and it generated unforeseen consequences that we're now dealing with at home. Now we can see those consequences, maybe we can leave well alone there and focus on our own internal issues first. I'd rather pay a policeman's salary for another year than fire another missile - and I think the costs are similar.
My problem with this, TBD, is that having made ill-advised forays into both Afghanistan and Iraq and seen the problems this has caused, both in those respective countries and the repercussions at home, we have systematically repeated these mistakes in both Libya and Syria. What is it called when you repeat the same actions again and again whilst hoping for different results?
Totally agree with you about funding home security over military folly overseas.
My problem with this, TBD, is that having made ill-advised forays into both Afghanistan and Iraq and seen the problems this has caused, both in those respective countries and the repercussions at home, we have systematically repeated these mistakes in both Libya and Syria. What is it called when you repeat the same actions again and again whilst hoping for different results?
Totally agree with you about funding home security over military folly overseas.
That's pretty much what Corbyn just said.
My problem with this, TBD, is that having made ill-advised forays into both Afghanistan and Iraq and seen the problems this has caused, both in those respective countries and the repercussions at home, we have systematically repeated these mistakes in both Libya and Syria. What is it called when you repeat the same actions again and again whilst hoping for different results?
Totally agree with you about funding home security over military folly overseas.
It's called "repeating your mistakes", like you wrote, and I wish we'd stop.
Put the liberals on the next boat out after the Muslims by the look of it. But it's an unfair question Dipper and you know it. It's not Col's job to come up with a solution. He, like a lot of people including me, is angry, not just at the atrocity, but at the whole situation which has lead us to this state of affairs. From what I am reading he feels that our liberal values are at least partly to blame. In the case of Islam (or some forms of Islam, I can't be arsed to sub divide it) I think he may be right - it's such an isolating, all inclusive ideology (honestly, a religion which tells you how to dress and what to eat? And I know it's not the only one) that being open to it and making allowances for it may be a waste of time. But taking a defiantly illiberal approach to it, like in France (a proper secularist country), doesn't seem to help either. Today the police have said that ALL 3000 people they are trying to monitor have been brought to their attention by the Muslim community. I would like to compare this to France, how helpful is the community there (I don't know)?
Col, you know where I stand on religion and especially religious violence (and for that matter any totalitarian ideology, religious or political, no matter how 'peace loving' they claim to be or even are. All are straitjackets for the mind). Our liberal values might have significant downsides, and they may be ones that you are not prepared to accept, but for me they are part of what makes us 'us'. Chuck them out and the consequences are much broader than tackling Islamic extremism, and even that might not work. I am not willing to make the trade off. Yet.
But I do wish those people saying they feel persecuted just because they are Muslim, and the other apologists, would button it for a bit. Not helping. And I do blame the Liberals Democrats for getting rid of (Labour's) Control Orders as a condition for entering the coalition, and May for not bringing them back at the first opportunity. The TPIM successor is feeble and not even used - only 7 people on them.