HIAG and PISKIE going at it again and I'm just like: please log in to view this image Good to see the banter and humour continues, lads. We will not let the snitches win!
Give it a rest ffs. We get it, he supports Spurs, you support Spurs....you want to twist things somehow so that HIAG doesn't look like the biggest helmet on the planet....or that everyone else is just as bothered by him blah blah.....like any of it matters. It's not important....at least not important enough to lose your own dignity over it.
Got **** all to do with it. And if you don't get that, you don't get anything. He does this on purpose, ffs!..it gets the attention he wants and has all his 'fan club' hopping up and down trying to outdo each other. When they're not all slapping each other on the back, that is...,
I know what you are saying. But if the people on here don't get this by now, they never will. its just hilarious everytime this happens 1) HIAG makes a twat of himseld 2) The vultures descend to take the piss 3) A spurs fan (either yourself, Spurlock or SD etc come in with the "ooooh you have fallen for his.....blah blah". I think HIAG would get much more irritated if people ignored him. I actually think he would go postal and attempt real life suicide, since the attention and approval of every one on this site seems to be his driving force in life (And he is a ****ing 50 year old, rich lawyer with children )
I've no idea who or what he is, tbh. But I know enough about him to know he's sitting somewhere laughing his arse off at all this **** flying around. I don't think he wants approval. He knows he ain't gonna get it from the usual suspects. But if he can get them all hopping about, talking about him, he's scored!
Not wanting to doubt you, Miss Marple, but that is your standard response. You've been calling Saints a sock for months, even though the jury is still out on that. Eventually you had to get it right. For me he started to make it obvious with the HIAGster comment, and the lay-by had to be deliberate.
Utter bollox. Can only speak for myself, my issue has always been about the extreme overreaction to it all. It's just a bit of harmless fun, but several posters just wallow in proving him false and spending page after tedious page discussing it. I don't care. I would certainly never do what you describe in point 3.
... . you do seem to have a rather peculiar and skewed view of him at times NSIS ... his meltdowns amply demonstrate that it's him, far more than anyone else, who gets 'hot under the collar' ... the art of wumming is not (in my book at least) to continually throw your toys out of the pram when the wum gets exposed ... whilst admittedly you can't be certain of anything on an internet forum, he often comes across as an incredibly frustrated individual and a very sore loser ... The one thing that none of us should ever do is pander to his nonsense by not addressing it IMHO ... it's "our" forum ... not his personal platform for self aggrandisement ... and that is all.
Of course it's bollocks, the poor bloke is all over the place! I see someone gave him one hell of rogering the other day when he was lauding the wum exploits of CFC (who I find amusing fwiw) and it was brought l up that he has bored this place to tears with essay after essay denouncing the wum exploits of hiag! He was so out of his depth his response was along the lines of "well ehm, it's different. Why? Just because it is OK" He then falls hook line and sinker into my trap yesterday where he says he will ignore and not be drawn into Spurlock and gingers argument in which Skiddy racially abused Spurlock. This would be the bloke who couldn't ignore spats to the extent he had to rat out half the board In short, do not take a lot of stock out of what he says. He's just not bright enough to mix it with the big boys on here
