Bans for diving

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
retrospective ban is a good start because sometimes the incidents are missed in real time anyway.

But I would like to see video ref come in for the major decisions. I'm frankly amazed it hasn't already when you see the general success in cricket, rugby, tennis etc and often adds another level of drama. The tech is also already there. Football perhaps doesn't have as many natural breaks in play as other sports but even so, refs need help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seabreeze
I think a one match ban is plenty to be honest. If you headbutt another player you'll probably only get a 3 match ban.

If every game is monitored and strictly enforced, increasing the ban to Draconian levels won't be necessary.

Studies show that the chance of being caught is the main deterrent to crimes, not the harshness of punishment.


Headbutting is more honourable than diving imho.

Diving should have been ruthlessly eradicated from these shores the moment it was first introduced by Jurgen Klinsman. Failure to do so has led to the current mess, and I now believe public execution to be the only reasonable method left to deal with this menace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby and Skylarker
I think a one match ban is plenty to be honest. If you headbutt another player you'll probably only get a 3 match ban.

If every game is monitored and strictly enforced, increasing the ban to Draconian levels won't be necessary.

Studies show that the chance of being caught is the main deterrent to crimes, not the harshness of punishment.
Is it though? It is cheating and weighing up 1 game ban or gaining 2 points - many will dive anyway. 2 points v 3 game ban and more to think about.
 
Is it though? It is cheating and weighing up 1 game ban or gaining 2 points - many will dive anyway. 2 points v 3 game ban and more to think about.
That's why video is the way forward . The video would stop the transfer of the gained points and you can still ban the player and team for the dive . Diving will dry up instantly IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
That's why video is the way forward . The video would stop the transfer of the gained points and you can still ban the player and team for the dive . Diving will dry up instantly IMO


So will Soccerball, if you stop it every five minutes to review video evidence. This ain't gridiron, where it's always fourteen down and ten in the forty niners twenty two, or some similar ****. Or Who's on third and What's on fifth etc.

Hence the viability of retrospective action; no need to stop the game, the risk of a later sanction should deter the miscreant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby and luvgonzo
So will Soccerball, if you stop it every five minutes to review video evidence. This ain't gridiron, where it's always fourteen down and ten in the forty niners twenty two, or some similar ****.

Hence the viability of retrospective action; no need to stop the game, the risk of a later sanction should deter the miscreant.
Only on game changing plays , otherwise the one match ban and fine will suffice at a later date . Most games won't even have a game changing error , but it needs to be in place at the ready
 
FA trying to set a precedent that will not catch on. It's part of the game in many foreign countries and they'll never punish players for it.

I'm not suggesting we accept diving, but this won't catch on. Why not just introduce something universal like video tech and that will catch all.
 
Only on game changing plays , otherwise the one match ban and fine will suffice at a later date . Most games won't even have a game changing error , but it needs to be in place at the ready


So long as video reviews only take place when the balls gone out of play. "If you don't see something, don't blow up" ought to be the abiding principle imo. And then there'd have to be a time limit on how far back you go. If decisions can be made in real time, as is the case with goal line technology, that's a different matter, but then you are getting into the area where you may be undermining the ref's authority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seabreeze and Libby
So long as video reviews only take place when the balls gone out of play. "If you don't see something, don't blow up" ought to be the abiding principle imo. And then there'd have to be a time limit on how far back you go. If decisions can be made in real time, as is the case with goal line technology, that's a different matter, but then you are getting into the area where you may be undermining the ref's authority.

Agree with this, the video review should only happen when the ball has gone out of play and should only be used in the instance that has just occurred. Also the video panel should be in communication with the ref via his earpiece and should advise the ref, who then makes the final decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
So long as video reviews only take place when the balls gone out of play. "If you don't see something, don't blow up" ought to be the abiding principle imo. And then there'd have to be a time limit on how far back you go. If decisions can be made in real time, as is the case with goal line technology, that's a different matter, but then you are getting into the area where you may be undermining the ref's authority.
Remember , there won't be a lot of time wasted watching the video on a dive in the box . In most cases , the video replay will be over and a decision made while the player is finished rolling on the ground and getting his " Phoney " medical attention ..lol