And that there is my biggest fear in the run in. is that we fall victim to a poor/dodgy decision's from officials , as you have stated Snodgrass was offside by a good yard , and the lines man was a good 3 yards behind the line of play the only reason we got away with it is that Snodgrass fluffed his lines, several times in the first half the linesman in front of the west stand was reluctant to make a decision and you could see him looking to Jones for guidance , i know people say these decision even out over a season, if that's the case then we are due a boat load of dodgy decisions going our way before the end of the season, i think i'm more afraid of the officials than i am of the opposition in this league.
Snodgrass' offside was closer to three inches than three yards. We've had some really **** decisions go against us this season, but that one comes a long way down the list, he was barely a foot offside.
I think one of the most exciting moments this season was his equaliser against Newcastle. We were down to 10 men and they had taken the lead with hardly any time to go. Lead to us winning the shoot out and then the exciting semi including beating United at KC.
what i was saying olm, is that the linesman was way behind the line of play by about 3 yards not Snodgrass, who i agree was only just off but that said if he had put it away then we would have been looking at 2-2 and two dropped points, and city would have once again been on the wrong end of a poor decision.
They named two players, why they named them, I don't have a clue, but your speculation, is just that speculation. 3 of the current squad said this in a public meeting and there is nothing else to read into it.
I'm not debating he was offside but to be fair it was only by half a yard. Elmo was much more then half a yard behind him though so was just making the comment that Elmo didn't have him in his pocket and when it really mattered he almost punished us.
'Such a waste of money and he's giving us nothing at the moment.' 'From what I saw tonight, albeit on a stream, the poor bloke looked like he'd never played football before.' 'Marco Silva obviously knows a player, he was widely criticised at the time for selling Snodgrass. Bet he couldn't believe that Bilic wanted him, and when we actually paid the money we did, for him, he must've been laughing.' 'He's been dire. Ran about a bit in his first few games, has put in one good cross and just looks totally lost.' 'Last night at Arsenal he literally didn't look anything like a professional sportsman' http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167282&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=560
that's the thing though, apart from first half of this season when he had the form of his life, he is bang average if we stay up and west ham go down it would literally the BEST thing ever.. he'd be relegated with 3 teams in a row.. and would make his decision even funnier
No, no he's not - you cant say that. If it wasn't for him we'd already be relegated etc, etc. Actually liked this description 'we sign this snail paced, one footed, heavily aged Scotsman for 10m because he has scored a few free kicks' and then the other poster who simply put up a big pic of a snail.
I'm always grateful to players who put a shift in & snoddy always did that for me! And his free kicks were usually on the money! But when you look at what marko & turbo did last night? They're in a different league! So he's the hammers problem now!
Martin Keown says Robert Snodgrass will question his West Ham move http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2017/04/0...bert-snodgrass-will-question-his-west-ham-mo/ (Ho-te-ho...)
He looks like he's not right in the head to me. It's almost as if those newspaper stories about a recently transferred married premier league player moving cities after getting his girlfriend pregnant have affected him...
