Amazed that a woman who earns that much needs to go on Tinder - bet that photo she has put up isnt her.
Yeah she looks ok but nothing from the top of the chest down do I'm concerned she might be a weeble ! I'm tempted to ask for a full length photo but it might sound a bit shallow
I suspect that if she has put on her profile that she earns £100K then shallow is not going to be a massive obstacle mate
When I first started working in payroll the top rate of tax was 85%. Now it's 45%. One of the problems with this country is the well off don't want to pay their bloody taxes. That's why the place is run on charity. Make the bastards cough up.
It's also the lazy workshy doleites who sponge off the country whilst spending their 'benefits' on drugs, ***s and booze. Have you seen how many council estates have sky dishes? My big issue though... is with big business. Them ****s pay **** all tax in the UK by playing the system. Once out of the EU we should force these global tax dodgers to pay their fair share of tax instead of 'declaring a loss' here and posting the profit in another country.
The BNP are for national health... national everything if I remember correctly There's only a handful of prominent UKIP members who advocate for having the consumer take the place of the taxpayer in keeping our health system However my tip for next conservative party leader is Owen Patterson who is a small government man and I'm sure he'll see off any opposition from the other lot pretty handily.
Google, Starbucks, there's plenty who are getting a free pass but that ends when the lobbyists and cronyism become a thing of the past. You're right on the money regarding council estates, when we have workshy youths getting about, smoking dope and eating take-out on the backs of the taxpayers. The solution to that problem is instead of offering a giro, offer tokens for essentials and maybe that will give people incentive to apply for a few jobs here and there.
Agree there. Milk tokens used to be the thing for young mums to be given. I worked at Safeway though in my youth and unfortunately the managers told the till staff to treat milk tokens as cash. In effect a young mum could spend them on bottles of whiskey.
I can't imagine being so much of a do-gooder I would let somebody purchase liquor instead of essentials which children may be relying on. I miss Safeway... Kwik save too.
There is a small underbelly of scum at both the bottom and top of society. The small percentage of scum at the bottom have no desire to work and contribute to society. The small percentage of scum at the top have no desire to pay their fair share and contribute to society. In between 95% of people either work or want to work, and do the very best for themselves and their families without screwing other people over in the process. Sadly, no matter what governments of any political persuasion throw at these people they are savvy enough to play the system and thrive. The honest 95% in between are the ones who face the brunt of sanctions and legislation.Those out of work who want to work end up being screwed by sanctions, and those in work end up getting screwed by taxes because they can't afford the accountants and lawyers who know hoe to play the game. At the same time, this majority gets labelled because of the actions of the minority. Most people out of work want to work. Most people paying tax want to pay their fair share. The majority aren't the ones who grab the headlines though.
There's other well documented problems with tokens/vouchers. People on benefits need all kinds of goods and services just like everyone else - food, utilities, clothes, transport, etc. If you have vouchers that are so wide ranging in their use they end up effectively being currency or traded for currency. Also, many (most?) people on benefits actually do work and the benefits only top up their income. It seems like a good idea at first and I used to argue that it would work, but I don't think it would be that great a solution in all honesty. What I think would make a much bigger difference is the government throwing everything behind job creation in areas of high unemployment - tax breaks or rent free land for large foreign companies who commit to producing their goods in certain areas of the UK, build their factories for them if you have to, whatever. Areas like the north east have had industries decimated decades ago and very little has been done to replace the lost jobs. Instead they have argued that you let the big cities get richer and richer and the prosperity spills out, which as far as I can tell from living in the north east is complete ****e.
If you're rich you are ok if you're poor you get a free pass If you're like me and somewhere on the middle you'll do as you're told, get **** all help and live out the struggle **** you
Think the whole unemployments benefit scheme should be changed to avoid an element of society using it as a lifestyle choice. I would have a time limit on how long it could be claimed for (say 2years). At the same time I would look at how the council are funding some of the work that they have. Just seems daft for goverment to fund unemployment benefit and local councils to outsource gardening, cleaning and other maintenance services. Anyone who has been unemployed for more than 2years is then offered a job with council to do this work, with training provided where necessary. Could afford to pay them more than Jobseekers Allowance on savings made on outsourced costs. Creation of this long term unemployed was a result of the loss of our industrial base. Unfortunately there is a proportion of society that was previously employed in this sector that never was and never will be capable of working in the business sectors that the UK is big in today (technology, financial services etc). I think if they could be matched up to government/council work they could do it might change their attitude in the long term. Its easy to judge them and call them scum but I suspect that it is an attitude that has developed over generations dating back to major industrial/manufacturing large scale job losses in the 70s to Asia.
