Match Day Thread 2016/17 Premier League, Cups & Euro Watch
- Thread starter astro
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Yeah a stamp on the bonce from a 15 stone bloke wearing boots is perfectly safe
Yeah a 15 stone athlete deliberately performing a move even combat sports have banned is perfectly safe
I never said it was, it was you making the stupid assertionYeah a 15 stone athlete deliberately performing a move even combat sports have banned is perfectly safe
Nothing stupid about what I said, but you jumped to Man Utd's defence before looking
Yeah a 15 stone athlete deliberately performing a move even combat sports have banned is perfectly safe
You seem to be arguing the same point.
Made Stirling my Fantasy captain cos of two games this week and that **** pep has dropped him! 
Shut up you daft twat
You claiming a stamp on the head was somehow less dangerous than an elbow was solely driven by your bile spewing United bitterness, nothing more nothing less. As you've just further demonstrated lol
Shut up you daft twat
You claiming a stamp on the head was somehow less dangerous than an elbow was solely driven by your bile spewing United bitterness, nothing more nothing less. As you've just further demonstrated lol
I just want [HASHTAG]#consistency[/HASHTAG] but even when banning both players the FA need to be seen to favour Man Utd
Made Stirling my Fantasy captain cos of two games this week and that **** pep has dropped him!
****ing same.
Its got **** all to do with bias, you could claim bias if they didn't charge Zlatan.
What the **** does it matter to United that Mings got a bigger ban?
A 3 match ban for an elbow is standard
A 3 match ban for a stamp is also standard
Has anyone been given a straight 5 match ban before, or are the FA just making things up as they go after Zlatan was caught [HASHTAG]#bangtorights[/HASHTAG] by every media outlet on the planet?
It matters because Man Utd, and every kid in the country, has been told by the FA they deliberate violent conduct retaliation is more tolerable than something that may have been accidental.
It matters to Man Utd because now every headline leads with "Mings banned for 5 games for stamping Zlatan" which their sponsors are very happy about.
Didn't Ben Thatcher get a 7 match ban or something for his elbow on Mendes? Though accepted that was closer to assault than any other elbow I've seen on a football pitch.
Accidental
Stopped reading there, go give your head a wobble and let the bile subside mate
Accidental
Stopped reading there, go give your head a wobble and let the bile subside mate
If was intentional he did well to land on his head while looking the opposite direction and being pushed by Rooney
On the other hand there is zero reasonable doubt over the elbow being intentional, so the FA making an example in this case is insane
- Status