Linford Christie Stadium

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

QPR999

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Mar 26, 2011
22,179
18,297
113
Surrey
QPR discussing move to site of Linford Christie Stadium

By David McIntyre 09/02/2017

QPR are looking into the possibility of a new 30,000-capacity ground on the site of the Linford Christie Stadium.

You must log in or register to see images


It comes amid continued problems and delays with the proposed regeneration of Old Oak, where the club has been seeking to build a stadium.

Rangers are now assessing the feasibility of a new community stadium in partnership with athletics club Thames Valley Harriers.

Harriers use the venue next to Wormwood Scrubs, which opened as the West London Stadium in 1967 and was renamed in 1993 – the year after the Hammersmith-raised Christie won an Olympic 100 metres gold medal.

It is situated just a mile from Loftus Road, which has been QPR’s home for all but three of the last hundred years.

http://www.westlondonsport.com/qpr/qpr-discussing-move-site-linford-christie-stadium
 
In theory, it is a good location as it is close to Lotus Road However, I can already hear the screams of no pubs nearby.

The key question is will it have a running track?

If yes, then I am most strongly against. If no, then for me or could be a possible option.

However, I can't see a viable football and athletics solution if it is to be a partnership.with the Harriers.

As above, I can't see this flying unless it is a complex of a football stadium and a separate running track.

It also does also indicate that Old Oak has very serious problems and a plan B is being developed.
 
Harriers don't need a 30k stadium so it could be feasible to have the track covered with seats that are in place for our games and removed inbetween. Hate stadiums with a track before the pitch!
 
Didn't we discuss this years ago on here and there were a million and one reasons why it was deemed a poor idea?

Better geographically but football stadia and running tracks don't mix well imo.
 
For me this was always the place (other than BBC). W!2
Notice we have gone from 40K to 35K now 30K If it gets any smaller we might as well stay at HQ.
They should do like Man City and have a smaller training ground attacted so that can have a running track.
A big no no for a track inside the stadium.
 
Last edited:
The cynic in me says, Things not looking good at QPR so Tone brings out another stadium story to stop the fans talking about the football. :emoticon-0127-lipss
 
It's a yes from me and I think 30k is a good starting point. When/if we go up and stay up then we can enlarge, the stadium can be designed to be expanded cheaply and easily. HQ can be used for TF's housing plan and may even pay for the stadium.
I thought the problem when this was discussed before was the proximity of the stadium to the hospital.
 
The cynic in me says, Things not looking good at QPR so Tone brings out another stadium story to stop the fans talking about the football. :emoticon-0127-lipss
You and I are on the same page with this one Ellers. Tony and his mates running out of the money perhaps?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ELLERS
I think that the wording in the 'Wormwood Scrubs Act 1879' kills this idea off ...

''The Act gives rights and authority to the public, the Army and the Metropolitan Board of Works and its successors. The public's right to enjoy Wormwood Scrubs is protected in perpertuity - it may not be taken back wholesale by the military or sold unless the area "ceases to be used by the citizens of London"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormwood_Scrubs_Act_1879

https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cmhs2/petitions/0061.pdf