So you've now reverted to pretending you once lived in Uruguay to try and justify your point. And whats with 'negr(it)o'? doing that wont change what Suarez said and the difference between the two words in or out of context, and throwing in your perceived ability to read the mind of someone you've never met for extra effect is funny. Suarez was himself brought up in the slums of Montevideo in poverty so he was one of the 'slum class' and his grandfather is 'black', pretending that all poor people from Uruguay are racist is pathetic but don't let the truth get in the way of one of your rants eh. I don't give a flying one what you think of Suarez or if you believe JT's version of his story or not, i replied to DL's post because his post was based on life experience.
You should stick with your first opinion son. You only have to look to what your fellow Chelsea fan thinks is an ordinary reaction to his tea turning up a bit late to see racism is rife , particularly with the " I'm not racist but' crew . People who say racist things, such as your fellow Chelsea fan, are racist. As to why, ignorance, arrogance and laziness
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/...-terry-ashley-cole-chelsea-england?CMP=twt_gu crucified in this along with Cole. Didnt want to start a new thread so this seemed best place for it.
Lets explore the facts! Terry has been acquitted in a court of law. Terry was charged of the same by the FA and through the civil balance of probability to be guilty which in my view falls well short of justice. He has been fined and banned. CASE CLOSED MOVE ON
That's not a fact at all. The magistrate also found Terry's explanation to be implausible so to imply an acquittal equates to innocence is either naive or, more likely, bias on your part.
You clearly are extremely dense and I suggest you read the post again, everything you have said is what you think I wrote. Whether you like it or not Terry was acquitted and I am entitled to my opinion as you are yours. So stop being a bitter child and move on before you make yourself a bigger ignoramus than usual.
It's quite possible to have a different opinion without being bitter. All I'm saying is that to take the raw fact that he received a not guilty verdict without delving further into the background behind that verdict, which is now widely known, lends a distorted view to your argument. To keep it topical, if they find there's not sufficient evidence to find a guilty verdict on a suspected *****phile, but the magistrate/judge declares there's a pretty good chance he did what he was accused of but he's bound by the existence of reasonable doubt, you'd think twice before inviting him round to babysit.
Your the bitter one here, it may be a raw fact to you but a fact none-the-less. How could use a comparison between a *****phile and an alleged racist comment only serves to demonstrate your wish to vilify John Terry. As someone else wrote as we are talking facts is that Anon Ferdinand is a knob head & he is undoubtedly black. John Terry's only misfortune is that he allegedly used all those facts in one sentence. As it is, he has been dealt with by the FA and therefore the case is closed. Some rangers fans, yourself included & the news media seem to want to demonise him. I can see their part in this is to sell more newspapers but I am not sure why you seek the same. I'm putting it down to inbred bitterness and Jealousy as there seems no other logical explanation for the hate.
Except it's not really closed because we are still seeing the fallout in the papers and it won't be until an appeal does go in and is rejected or upheld or an appeal doesn't go in and he serves a ban. I wasn't comparing him to a *****phile- I was comparing your decision to look only at the most basic of details in the case to that of a parent in that situation. Your comments on Ferdinand aren't even worth replying to. I like posting on this forum and others as it's a good place to debate football issues with sensible individuals that happen to support another club. That's the point of a multi-club forum. I've had some reasoned and intelligent football chat with District, Drogs and others on here often (even LF when he's taken his pills). If you don't like QPR and other fans posting on the Chelsea section then you are best served using a Chelsea only forum. I'm sure there are many.
Anyway, I'm off for the evening. I look forward to your reply if there is one. It really need not be serious enough to lose your rag and think people are inbred as they've chosen one football club over another- that's a bit odd when you think about it.
Oh its closed alright, make no mistake about it the verdicts are in and the punishment given (rightly or wrongly) that will remain concrete. The media will attempt to squeeze every morsel out of it as it is their way. Its also my opinion that you were deliberately comparing him to a *****phile because that is the most hatred crime known to man in my book and you could have used hundreds of others in your shameful attempt to vilify him. You may well like posting on this forum but you seem to have a problem with anybody who has a differing opinion to yours whereby you wheel out the petty insults like earlier and when these are met with the expected you get all prissy. Like it or lump it fella if your going after one of England's best ever defenders of the modern age because of your bitterness for Chelsea then I suggest its you who needs to look elsewhere because if you keep that up no one will bother with you.
