World War III

I quite like Assad. He doesnt even look like an Allah botherer.

 

It was on Monday night, National Geographic, Banged Up Abroad. Should be able to get it on Anytime+ or download. Spawny bastard though straight on the kief!!

 

I'd guess he's probably in the top 10% of international leaders in terms of being a nice guy, with every leading american politican (with the possible exception of obama himself) miles behind him.

Let's bomb the crap out of him though for being an evil despot

 

I`m on China`s side..

please log in to view this image

 

You don't get my point? That's a shame.

 

Do you get your point then ?

 

You type some amount of **** but this takes the biscuit. He's an eye surgeon and had a good education so he's not a bad man. Joseph mengele was a ****ing saint wasn't he

 

Oh I understand what I was saying, I think everyone else did too...apart from you.

Here try this version:

Syria refused to sign up to an agreement NOT to use Chemical weapons. Does this mean that they used them last week? Not at all, but if it was the Rebels who launched this attack, then the best guess as to the source of their weapons was the Syrian regime itself.

 

No he wasn't. It's well known he supported portsmouth.

 

Thick as ****e in the neck of an Irn Bru bottle.

 

so you think the syrian government gave the chemical weapons to the rebels in order for the rebels to fire the chemical weapons back at the syrian government ?

 

I think it more likely that either they were captured or Syrian defectors nicked them

 

Corruption or theft, either way the regime are to blame. If they had got rid of their weapons this might never have happened.

 

Yep, IF it was in fact the rebels at all. I'm still to be convinced either way at this point.

 

Not obsessed no. Also your knowledge of the capabilities of the Syrian air defence system is that of a *****.

 

I don't get your point either. I still and can't get my head around why people like you are supporting Al Qaeda in this one. I'm not surprised, after Libya, but still can't figure it out

 

have you not heard that the rebels brought chemical weapons into the country through turkey ?

even if the rebels had stolen the weapons from the government, how does that make it more appropriate to take the side of the rebels over the side of the government ? would it not be better to support the side that does not want to use them, instead of supporting the side that does want to use them ?

 

I guess you didn't read the story I posted about Al Qaeda members arrested in Turkey trying to smuggle Sarin over the border. But no it's all the regimes fault.
It's also funny how the West has been crying for Syria to let in the inspectors months after the last rebel chemical attacks so to assess vital evidence and this very conveniently happens just as they arrive, Assad grants them access after s matter of days and suddenly it's too late for the evidence to be gathered. Honestly like, how are people suckered in by this.