Just wondered what the fans on this site think about the proposed boycott by the Killie Supporters Association ? I admire much of what Baz & Sandy have done for Killie but IMO a boycott will only hurt the club and there running fued with all things Johnston should not be detrimental especially finacially to our club.I am no admirer of MJ but to the people that really matter ie the bank he is doing a good job in alledgedly decreasing our overdraft and amount owed.If after the season we have just had, which by all accounts was "successful" he posts another loss then his fiscal policies will need to be scrutinised more closely.Until then I will tentatively back MJ.
I think that the Killie Supporters Association need to remember that MJ is not there as a suger daddy to fund the takeover of theworld, but is there to plug the financial leaks - reduce the debt, minimise expenses and increase turnover. So far the debt has been reduced and costs dramatically reduced - all while keeping us in the SPL. Id say that that is a success for a club without any financial input from their chairman. I would never boycott my own clubs games, thats just stupid. Will do far more damage to the club than any perceived damage they believe MJ to have caused. What are their reasons behind the boycott? 5th place too disapointing for them???? Have to admit I am slightly concerned with the speedy exits by so many players but it allows wage space for the manager to bring in his own players and put his stamp on the team. He wants us to play football next season again, should be entertaining and with the right players in could be pushing for top six again.
Boycotts have never achieved anything. How would boycotting matches help the club? NO money in is the last thing we need. Boycott away matches - other clubs get hurt Its a very difficult thing to do (change things at a football club) The best thing to do would be to get a billionaire interested in the club and buy the club. Lets just concentrate on next season and getting behind the team.
