They have never seen the inside of a prison AQ has never been charged and found guilty of a crime in this country yet spent a decade inside that is the point
It's not really the point though is it? Bush and Blair have no reason to see the inside of a prison because they have never been charged with any crime. Qatada broke bail conditions in 2008 which is against English law.
And entered the country on a fake passport. And was involved in a civil war in Algeria. And preaches hate-sermons against the country he's been granted asylum in. What a lovely chap
That is exactly the point. one lot have never been charged therefore not seen a prison cell the other one has not been charged and had almost ten years worth one rule for one tec also the bail conditions were for what?
he is not getting chiucked out for that though is he He may be everything but a nice fell, however the law should be the law
The bail conditions were set for his conditions while outside of prison. The fact that he then broke those conditions and therefore the law proves that he is a criminal.
Totally irrelevant. He broke set conditions whilst on bail and that is breaking English law. That makes him a convicted criminal. You can try and twist it any way you like but you cannot change fact.
he is not in prison due to being a convicted criminal how can you be 'convicted' if you have never been charged?
He's a convicted criminal because he broke the law. If I was mistakenly arrested and charged with a crime that I was innocent of but then decided to punch a policeman in the face and found guilty I would still be a criminal regardless of how innocent I was of the original crime. Qatada broke the law while out on bail and is therefore a criminal.