Transfer Embargo

I saw something I shouldn't have around 12 months ago suggesting the clubs itself's commercial creditworthiness was actually less than my own.

 

You'd think that much was obvious, wouldn't you?

 

We've just paid off Villa and Man City and will clear overdue creditors. Players keep getting paid. That's evidence! Yes there's been issues but we simply don't know the ins and outs. We (he) clearly are not skint though.
We are going round in circles so let's leave it there and see what comes.

 

Most businesses losing however many £K a week would have a poor credit score / worthiness, saying that recent signs are not looking good for the club generally , a lot could / will depend on the outcome of the appeal and length of sanctions...

I still have hope...

And yes it's what gets you...

Though been here before - just wish we wasn't again..

 

My hope is that he can make good on his commitments, but there lies the question.

If he can, then why hasn't he?

And if we're not skint then why are the outstanding supplier invoices only 'being paid' as opposed to 'been paid'?

 

I fear you'll have more words to eat by the time this finishes playing out.

 

Oh god please just stop

 

How do you know these bills haven’t been paid just because we got found out?

I’m not saying it’s definitely the truth, but it’s not beyond the realms of possibility. I don’t think we can determine any sort of facts just because we now happen to have paid off debts we’ve been called out on.

 

How do we know the bills have been paid with liquidity from the club or more leverage from Acun Medya?

 

The inference appears to be that Acun Medya paid the footballing arrears and the suppliers 'will be paid' and I believe a chunk of the TV money drops quite imminently - so I expect that's why they are still 'in the process'.

 

I always love when you answer your question for me.

 

It’s remarkable how you keep repeating the same points over and over but believe you’re making a new insightful point each time.

Acun has confirmed the club has had cash flow problems. Cash flow problems stem from temporary liquidity shortages. This is not the same as insolvency (where we really would be in the ****). A business can face the former without facing the latter if it has sufficient assets or future income potential.

Theres no evidence in the public domain that Acun doesn’t have the assets within the companies he owns to be able to raise funds to cover the outstanding debts. The fact both debts to other clubs were both immediately settled to remove the threat of the more serious sanction of a transfer embargo is evidence of this.

I genuinely don’t know what you expect to happen if enough fans like you convince the owner he’s not welcome whatever he does.

Under what scenario does the owner putting the club up for sale mean anything other than even more uncertainty for years to come versus a more likely scenario where we get the fee ban reduced to one window, the Manager gets us through to January in mid table and then we see where we go from there.

 

Braggart.


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.

 

Another username change. Can’t for the life of me figure out who it is now…

 

AcunsBurnerAccount, didn't know he liked pork.


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.

 

I think he was being sarcastic..

 

I’ve got an idea, why don’t you colour your replies to each other, in crayon if you like as you’re acting like ****ing kids. That way we can just fly past all this ****. I’ve just popped on to see if there is any news, 157 posts… 154 of ****ing nonsense, so by colouring in your replies I can just flick past them..
You really are embarrassing yourself!!!!!

 

I only did 3 posts.

 

May be that's the disguise.

 

We've got better. It's called usernames and a quote function.