Fine, **** it. I won't moderate anything, and I won't bother with any match threads next season. I'm answering accusations levelled directly at me. Sorry if that is "derailing a thread" but when someone insults me or knocks something that I do I feel I should be allowed to respond. Next time I'll just sit and stew. Norway, if you are genuinely here for debate then ignore KJ. If you're not here for debate then you won't. Let's see what happens.
Scott-please read the post! i said Ash,not you ! As for question,thats easy the clue is in the title of this web site. Debate and create..FREELY IF im here to debate?? Cheap dig, i contribute more than you,ash and KJ put together..i await your apology on that one.
Cant beleive scottswan is questioning my contribution to this forum! You need to spend a bit more time on here and see the input instead of stopping in once in a blue moon, doubt you would have said the same
I apologise for misreading the earlier post, but not for my earlier post regarding ignoring KJ. What my post means is if, like you say, you are here for debate, then the sensible option is to ignore KJ. If, and I'm not saying I believe this, you are here to be a protagonist and wind people up you'll keep choosing to see his posts and respond to them. How you act determines what I will think in the next few days but if you clearly are here for debate then you will be doing EVERYONE on here a favour as most people get on Norway, I appreciate your threads and your input but that doesn't give you carte blanche to say and do anything you want unfortunately. Honestly, this'll be my last post on any bickering. I'll send PM's but I won't get involved on threads, but Norway, for the benefit of the forum you and Phil should put KJ on ignore. If you can't help but respond then do it. Like I've said, if you can give me one logical reason other than the "comment freely" line (which doesn't really apply as you can still comment freely, you're just hiding a little bit of reading which it doesn't say anything about) why you shouldn't block KJ I'm all ears? Send it by PM though.
No idea what you're posting, NJ but you seem to be derailing your mate's thread. Seem to recall you publicly admitted a while back that you actually get a kick from winding people up. Go ahead, surprise me and prove me wrong. Making the mods' lives more difficult than it already is helps nobody. Like Scott said, stop picking fights with all and sundry and put me on ignore. Not rocket science, and everyone's a winner.
So what your saying is if i dont put him on ignore that means im a wind up merchant does it? Sorry mate but your bang out of order There, Since when have i said and done as i please on here? Think you Will Find thats not true, you really need to spend a bit of time on Here scott you obviously have no clue.
Kevin Cullis was a joke of a manger we had for about 5 mins under Petty, the players kicked him out if the dressing room at half time he was that clueless
If the Mods can't see who is derailing the threads, then their not doing their job correctly, either that or their blind and stupid, which I don't think they are, but maybe the people in white coats will be back for him soon! ...............
Looks like we all now know what Siggy was after at the end of the day and that was money! Liverpool didnt buckle to his wage demands so he is off to spurs...cant see him getting game time there either with VDV behind the striker!
To be fair, NJ is a great poster and I enjoy your posts, but for me, your not the issue. Phil, KJ, you blatantly dislike one another, and constant snide remarks, from both of you, derail threads. KJ has Phil on ignore, i suggest Phil does the same and the problem is resolved.
JA but NJ has proved an immense problem, and he's proving that again judging by Scott's responses. He has stated publicly he gets a rise out of winding people up but he won't bother me again because I have him on 'Ignore' for my own sanity and the good of the forum. Speaks volumes to my mind that both he and Phill are apparently refusing to reciprocate. Thanks for the support btw.
I rest my case . Kj has just proved the problem with the above statement, he has a hard on for me that is quite disturbing !
Aussiejerk argues with Dai = Dai must put him on his ignore list? Aussie argues with PDJ = PDJ must put him on his ignore list? Aussie argues with Norway = Norway must put him on his ignore list? Aussie argues with Musty = Musty must put him on his ignore list? And so the never ending Aussie story goes on! Spot the common denominator Mods? No prizes for guessing though! who's next to be at the end of poisoned dwarf! shall we put everyone on the Aussie ignore list? in a word simply pathetic, why don't you mods do your job, and remove his personal attacks, that way you are targeting the issue directly, not having everyone else to have to put this plonker on an ignore list! grow some balls and do your jobs!.............. PS: Nothing personal Mods, have a nice day!......................
They still giving you **** JA? Judging by your responses I guess that's the case. No surprise. What's so difficult about using ignore? I think it's great, personally.
