Of the parties that actually have a realistic chance of securing seats, UKIP are probably the best option. I even think UKIPs policy's aren't right wing enough for me though. Atleast they will be getting rid of the inheritance tax though. It certainly would be quite amusing to see how they deal with a few things if they did get into power
I don't drive. Which explains my sleek, writhing taut and honed body as I pounce like a svelte black panther. Meowwwww.
As a single man I'm paying for hospitals to deliver your kids and look after them when they're sick, schools to educate them and, unless you're earning shedloads, a few quid every week for you to do what you like with whilst pretending that it's all being spent on them. You might also enjoy a tax credit even if you earn more than I bloody do.* The you is being used in the general context as opposed to the you in particular.
Oooft - belter Wasn't it the UKIP communications officer who, when asked why they didnlt win any Euro seats in london said something along the lines of "the profile is hard for us to win seats there- you're talking about a highly educated and cultured demographic"
My favourite was the clip of Farage being interviewed on the street in Edinburgh and a passerby shouts "Racist Homophobes". "What do you say to that?" asks the interviewer. "Well we're not Homophobes" says Farage...the ****.
The EDL may have very right wing beliefs on immigration, however they likely have very left wing views on handouts. All they are fighting against is Muslims. There not even a political party, so not sure what your point is, if there is a point. As far as the BNP is concerned, I think you are stereo typing to much here. There are probably plenty of idiots who support them for their strict policy's on immigrantion, without actually understanding all their policy's. But the core of the BNP support that actually understand all there policy's rather than just the ones regrading race and immigration, are not your average benefit scrounger.
Well as single men you're also paying for a load of grannies in care homes which are nobody alive today's fault - presumably you got the schools and health when you were a kid too, and it's a bit harsh to begrudge the next generation these public services now that you have less use for them. Anyway, the point is that the UK has decided to be a social democracy and to redistribute wealth to pay for services and propping up living standards, and it's charged in proportion to what people earn. I agree with this to a certain extent - I think Dan does - Shergar doesn't because he's a big Tory. So if we are going to redistribute wealth then we need to assess the income of the people we are taking off and the people we are giving to. During this assessment it doesn't take into account how many people are being supported off a wage when taking - a one earner family with £60k income is £650 a month worse off than a two earner family on £30k a year each - but it will take into account how many people are supported in a family when it doles out the corresponding benefits. So I believe each individual having a tax free allowance, and being able to transfer it to their partner if they can't work, is fundamentally fair. P.S we need kids to pay our state pension as the Government has spent all the ****in money already.
My point was you inferred/implied that "Right Wingers" are all hard workers, in fact you actually said "A right wing country would be much better, as those who work hard and do well for themselves would not be forced to pay out for the lazy work shy parasites at the bottom. ". What about the Tory Grandees or Unelected Peers who've never done a day's ****ing work in their lives? They've certainly done well for themselves but most of them (maybe all of them) inherited their wealth and "Working Hard" does not even exist in their lexicon. And the fact that you seem to be defending the BNP tells me everything I need to know.
