That Mirallas tackle

It wasn't even close to what I was saying. try ****ing reading it properly & here's another tip, try actually debating the point rather than posting barbed inaccurate one liners & then following it up by calling me a prick.

Thanks.

 

Didn't you see my post were I watched the footage again and gave a little run down of what happened? Dowd definitely sees the marks before he shows a card.

EDIT; just saw your other post

 

Count back and see ... then keep counting


And good luck from me Jonesey with the job hunting, your step daughter as well.

 

You missed the point Tobes by saying that I thought the persecution was against Liverpool, per se (although that exists, and has done since the FA tried to force Liverpool to play a semi-final two weeks after 95 fans had died at Hillsborough). Rogers asked the wrong question when he said what would have happened had Suarez committed that tackle - the question should have been what would dowd have done had Mirallas committed that tackle on any other Liverpool player. we all know he'd have been sent off.

look, when I say he's an 'outlaw' I mean this. Say someone had been convicted of insurance fraud on several occasions - does that give the police the right to stand by and watch outside their home as it burgled and do nothing? that is the situation - as with the Norwich non-penalty. these decisions were not difficult: a four year old child with a whistle wouldn't have struggled with that Norwich one. ALL WE ARE ASKING IS FOR REFEREES TO GIVE DECISIONS BASED ON THE RULES OF THE GAME. Justice is blind, and all that.

And by the way, a B/s calling others for having a persecution complex.

 

Beat a dead horse, so many ways to skin a cat, etc. starting to see too many insults and it is going in circles.